OLAVARRIA IANISZEWSKY, VERONICA VIVIANA
Preferred name
OLAVARRIA IANISZEWSKY, VERONICA VIVIANA
Official Name
OLAVARRIA IANISZEWSKY, VERONICA VIVIANA
Main Affiliation
Email
v.olavarria@udd.cl
ORCID
0000-0003-4300-9921
Scopus Author ID
57204794060
74 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 74
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Scopus© Citations 8 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Dysphagia screening and risks of pneumonia and adverse outcomes after acute stroke: An international multicenter study(2020) ;Menglu Ouyang ;Elizabeth Boaden ;Hisatomi Arima ;Pablo M LavadosLaurent BillotDysphagia is associated with aspiration pneumonia after stroke. Data are limited on the influences of dysphagia screen and assessment in clinical practice. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p> To determine associations between a “brief” screen and “detailed” assessment of dysphagia on clinical outcomes in acute stroke patients. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> A prospective cohort study analyzed retrospectively using data from a multicenter, cluster cross-over, randomized controlled trial (Head Positioning in Acute Stroke Trial [HeadPoST]) from 114 hospitals in nine countries. HeadPoST included 11,093 acute stroke patients randomized to lying-flat or sitting-up head positioning. Herein, we report predefined secondary analyses of the association of dysphagia screening and assessment and clinical outcomes of pneumonia and death or disability (modified Rankin scale 3–6) at 90 days. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Overall, 8784 (79.2%) and 3917 (35.3%) patients were screened and assessed for dysphagia, respectively, but the frequency and timing for each varied widely across regions. Neither use of a screen nor an assessment for dysphagia was associated with the outcomes, but their results were compared to “screen-pass” patients, those who failed had higher risks of pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.18–4.10) and death or disability (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.41–1.95). Similar results were evidence for the results of an assessment for dysphagia. Subsequent feeding restrictions were related to higher risk of pneumonia in patients failed dysphagia screen or assessment (aOR = 4.06, 95% CI = 1.72–9.54). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Failing a dysphagia screen is associated with increased risks of pneumonia and poor clinical outcome after acute stroke. Further studies concentrate on determining the effective subsequent feeding actions are needed to improve patient outcomes.1Scopus© Citations 46 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Scopus© Citations 2 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 6 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Flat-head positioning increases cerebral blood flow in anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke. A cluster randomized phase IIb trial(2018); ; ; ; Javier Gaete<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Whether lying-flat improves blood flow in patients with acute ischemic stroke is unknown. Our aim was to investigate if lying-flat “changes” cerebral blood flow velocities assessed by transcranial Doppler in acute ischemic stroke patients. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> In a multicenter cluster clinical trial, we randomly assigned patients within 12 h from onset of a neurological deficit due to cerebral ischemia of the anterior circulation to lying-flat or upright head positioning. The primary outcome was a change of 8 cm/s or more in mean cerebral blood flow velocities on transcranial Doppler to the middle cerebral artery at 1 and 24 h post-randomization, adjusted for imbalance in baseline variables. Secondary outcomes included serious adverse events and physical functioning at 90 days. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Ninety-four of 304 patients screened were recruited. The primary outcome occurred in 11 (26%) of 43 patients in the lying-flat group and in 6 (12%) of 51 in the upright group at 1 h (adjusted odds ratio, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.54), and in 23 (53%) and 18 (36%) patients in these respective groups at 24 h (adjusted odds ratio, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.08 to 8.53). There were no between-group differences in serious adverse events, including pneumonia, heart failure or mortality, nor in functional outcome at 3 months (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI 0.64 to 3.00). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p> The lying-flat head position was associated with a significant increase in cerebral blood flow velocities at one and 24 h within the ipsilateral hemisphere of anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke, without serious safety concerns. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01706094. </jats:p></jats:sec>Scopus© Citations 23 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Statistical analysis plan for the Head Position in Stroke Trial (HeadPoST): An international cluster cross-over randomized trial(2017) ;Laurent Billot ;Mark Woodward ;Hisatomi Arima ;Maree L Hackett<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> There is evidence to indicate that the lying flat head position increases cerebral blood flow and oxygenation in patients with acute ischemic stroke, but how these physiological effects translate into clinical outcomes is uncertain. The Head Position in Stroke Trial aims to determine the comparative effectiveness of lying flat (0°) compared to sitting up (≥30°) head positioning, initiated within 24 h of hospital admission for patients with acute stroke. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p> An international, pragmatic, cluster-randomized, crossover, open, blinded outcome assessed clinical trial. Each hospital with an established acute stroke unit (cluster) site was required to recruit up to 140 consecutive cases of acute stroke (one phase of head positioning before immediately crossing over to the other phase of head positioning), including both acute ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage, in each randomized head position as a ‘business as usual’ policy. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p> To outline in detail the predetermined statistical analysis plan for the study. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> All accumulated data will be reviewed and formally assessed. Information regarding baseline characteristics of patients, their process of care and management will be outlined, and for each item, statistically relevant descriptive elements will be described. For the trial outcomes, the most appropriate statistical comparisons are described. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> A statistical analysis plan was developed that is transparent, verifiable, and predetermined before completion of data collection. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> We developed a predetermined statistical analysis plan for Head Position in Stroke Trial to avoid analysis bias arising from prior knowledge of the findings, in order to reliably quantify the benefits and harms of lying flat versus sitting up early after the onset of acute stroke. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title><jats:p> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02162017; ANZCTR identifier ACTRN12614000483651 </jats:p></jats:sec>10Scopus© Citations 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience(2023); ;Juan-Cristobal Nuñez ;Eloy Mansilla ;Gabriel Cavada<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> Background The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is time-dependent.</jats:p><jats:p> Objective To compare the door-to-needle (DTN) time of stroke neurologists (SNs) versus non-stroke neurologists (NSNs) and emergency room physicians (EPs). Additionally, we aimed to determine elements associated with DTN ≤ 20 minutes.</jats:p><jats:p> Methods Prospective study of patients with IVT treated at Clínica Alemana between June 2016 and September 2021.</jats:p><jats:p> Results A total of 301 patients underwent treatment for IVT. The mean DTN time was 43.3 ± 23.6 minutes. One hundred seventy-three (57.4%) patients were evaluated by SNs, 122 (40.5%) by NSNs, and 6 (2.1%) by EPs. The mean DTN times were 40.8 ± 23, 46 ± 24.7, and 58 ± 22.5 minutes, respectively. Door-to-needle time ≤ 20 minutes occurred more frequently when patients were treated by SNs compared to NSNs and EPs: 15%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.66–11.5, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis DTN time ≤ 20 minutes was associated with treatment by a SN (p = 0.002), coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period (p = 0.21), time to emergency room (ER) (p = 0.21), presence of diabetes (p = 0.142), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.007), atrial fibrillation (p < 0.09), score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (p = 0.001), lower systolic (p = 0.143) and diastolic (p = 0.21) blood pressures, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; p = 0.09), vessel occlusion (p = 0.05), use of tenecteplase (p = 0.18), thrombectomy (p = 0.13), and years of experience of the physician (p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, being treated by a SN (OR: 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44–10.8; p = 0.007), NIHSS (OR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; p < 0.002) and lower systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.96–0.99; p < 0.003) remained significant.</jats:p><jats:p> Conclusion Treatment by a SN resulted in a higher probability of treating the patient in a DTN time within 20 minutes.</jats:p>5Scopus© Citations 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Lipid-Lowering Pretreatment and Outcome Following Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study Trial(2018) ;Jatinder S. Minhas ;Xia Wang ;Hisatomi Arima ;Philip M. BathLaurent Billot<jats:p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Debate exists as to whether statin pretreatment confers an increased risk of 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. We assessed the effects of undifferentiated lipid-lowering pretreatment on outcomes and interaction with low-dose versus standard-dose alteplase in a post hoc subgroup analysis of the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In all, 3,284 thrombolysis-eligible AIS patients (mean age 66.6 years; 38% women), with information on lipid-lowering pretreatment, were randomly assigned to low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Of the total number of patients, 615 (19%) received statin or other lipid-lowering pretreatment. The primary clinical outcome was combined endpoint of death or disability (modified Rankin Scale scores 2–6) at 90 days. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Compared with patients with no lipid-lowering pretreatment, those with lipid-lowering pretreatment were significantly older, more likely to be non-Asian and more likely to have a medical history including vascular co-morbidity. After propensity analysis assessment and adjustment for important baseline variables at the time of randomisation, as well as imbalances in management during the first 7 days of hospital admission, there were no significant differences in mortality (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.58–1.25, <i>p</i> = 0.42), or in overall 90-day death and disability (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.67–1.09, <i>p</i> = 0.19), despite a significant decrease in sICH among those with lipid-lowering pretreatment according to the European Co-operative Acute Stroke Study 2 definition (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.28–0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.009). No differences in key efficacy or safety outcomes were seen in patients with and without lipid-lowering pretreatment between low- and standard-dose alteplase arms. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Lipid-lowering pretreatment is not associated with adverse outcome in AIS patients treated with intravenous alteplase, whether assessed by 90-day death and disability or death alone.</jats:p>Scopus© Citations 5 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 3