CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Emergency Department Workflow Times of Intravenous Thrombolysis with Tenecteplase versus Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    (S. Karger AG, 2025-02-03)
    Matias Guzman
    ;
    ;
    Gabriel Cavada
    ;
    Alejandro M. Brunser
    ;
    Veronica V. Olavarria
    Introduction: Tenecteplase (TNK) has demonstrated to be non-inferior to alteplase (ALT) for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). There are potential workflow benefits associated with TNK use, aiming to reduce patient length of stay in the emergency department. Our aim was to investigate whether the routine use of TNK during the COVID-19 pandemic influenced workflow times compared to historical use of ALT, while maintaining non-inferior clinical outcomes in a non-drip and ship scenario of a comprehensive stroke center. Methods: We included patients with AIS admitted from September 2019 to September 2022 and compared those treated with TNK during the COVID-19 pandemic to those treated with ALT in the period immediately before. We compared emergency department length of stay (EDLOS), door-to-needle time (DTN), door-to-groin puncture time (DTG), clinical and safety outcomes with adjusted general linear regression models. Results: 110 patients treated with TNK and 111 with ALT were included in this study. Mean EDLOS was 251 (SD = 164) min for TNK users versus 240 (SD = 148) min for ALT (p = 0.62). Mean DTN was 43 (SD = 25) min for TNK versus 46 (SD = 27) min for ALT users (p = 0.39). Mean DTN under 60 min was achieved in 86 (78.2%) patients and in 85 (76.5%) patients of the TNK and ALT groups, respectively (p = 1.0). DTN under 45 min was achieved in 65.4% and 58.6% (p = 0.65) of the TNK and ALT groups, respectively. DTG time was 114 (SD = 43) min for TNK versus 111 (58 = SD) min in the ALT group (p = 0.88). DTG under 90 min was achieved in 32% of the TNK group and 35% of the ALT group (p = 0.69). There were no differences in any of the clinical or safety outcomes between groups at 90 days. Conclusions: The adoption of TNK during COVID-19 pandemic did not result in a change in EDLOS, DTN, or DTG times when compared to ALT in this cohort. Safety and clinical outcomes were similar between groups. Probably a greater benefit could have been seen in a drip and ship thrombolysis setting. Further research is needed to assess the potential advantages of TNK in drip and ship scenarios of IVT.
    Scopus© Citations 2  2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Influence of renal function on blood pressure control and outcome in thrombolyzed patients after acute ischemic stroke: post-hoc analysis of the ENCHANTED trial
    (Frontiers Media SA, 2024-12-09)
    Xinwen Ren
    ;
    Chen Chen
    ;
    Xia Wang
    ;
    Qiang Li
    ;
    Yang Zhao
    <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The effect of renal impairment in patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is unclear. We aimed to determine the associations of renal impairment and clinical outcomes and any modification of the effect of intensive versus guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) control in the BP arm of the International Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We conducted a <jats:italic>post-hoc</jats:italic> analysis of the ENCHANTED BP arm, which involved 2,196 thrombolyzed AIS patients. Logistic regression models were used to define the association between eGFR and clinical outcomes of death, death or major disability [modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 3–6], and major disability (mRS 3–5) at 90 days.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of the 2,151 patients with available baseline renal function data (mean age 66.9 years; 38% women), 993 (46.2%), 822 (38.2%), and 336 (15.6%) had normal (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), mildly (60–89), and moderate-to-severely impaired (&amp;lt;60) renal function, respectively. Compared with patients with normal eGFR, mortality was higher in those with moderate-to-severe renal impairment (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05–2.99; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.031 for trend). However, the difference in death or major disability (mRS 3–6) was not significant between groups. There was no heterogeneity in the effect of intensive versus guideline-recommended BP-lowering treatment on death by grades of renal function (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> for interaction = 0.545).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>The presence of moderate-to-severe renal impairment is associated with increased mortality in thrombolyzed patients with AIS. Renal function does not modify the effect of early intensive BP-lowering treatment on death in this patient group.</jats:p></jats:sec>
      2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Who is in the emergency room matters when we talk about door-to-needle time: a single-center experience
    (2023) ;
    Juan-Cristobal Nuñez
    ;
    Eloy Mansilla
    ;
    Gabriel Cavada
    ;
    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> Background The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is time-dependent.</jats:p><jats:p> Objective To compare the door-to-needle (DTN) time of stroke neurologists (SNs) versus non-stroke neurologists (NSNs) and emergency room physicians (EPs). Additionally, we aimed to determine elements associated with DTN ≤ 20 minutes.</jats:p><jats:p> Methods Prospective study of patients with IVT treated at Clínica Alemana between June 2016 and September 2021.</jats:p><jats:p> Results A total of 301 patients underwent treatment for IVT. The mean DTN time was 43.3 ± 23.6 minutes. One hundred seventy-three (57.4%) patients were evaluated by SNs, 122 (40.5%) by NSNs, and 6 (2.1%) by EPs. The mean DTN times were 40.8 ± 23, 46 ± 24.7, and 58 ± 22.5 minutes, respectively. Door-to-needle time ≤ 20 minutes occurred more frequently when patients were treated by SNs compared to NSNs and EPs: 15%, 4%, and 0%, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 4.3, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.66–11.5, p = 0.004). In univariate analysis DTN time ≤ 20 minutes was associated with treatment by a SN (p = 0.002), coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic period (p = 0.21), time to emergency room (ER) (p = 0.21), presence of diabetes (p = 0.142), hypercholesterolemia (p = 0.007), atrial fibrillation (p &lt; 0.09), score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) (p = 0.001), lower systolic (p = 0.143) and diastolic (p = 0.21) blood pressures, the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS; p = 0.09), vessel occlusion (p = 0.05), use of tenecteplase (p = 0.18), thrombectomy (p = 0.13), and years of experience of the physician (p &lt; 0.001). After multivariate analysis, being treated by a SN (OR: 3.95; 95%CI: 1.44–10.8; p = 0.007), NIHSS (OR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.02–1.12; p &lt; 0.002) and lower systolic blood pressure (OR: 0.98; 95%CI: 0.96–0.99; p &lt; 0.003) remained significant.</jats:p><jats:p> Conclusion Treatment by a SN resulted in a higher probability of treating the patient in a DTN time within 20 minutes.</jats:p>
      5Scopus© Citations 1
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Breaking the breach in Latin America: A pilot study of mechanical thrombectomy in the public healthcare system in Chile
    (2020)
    Rodrigo Rivera
    ;
    Cristian Amudio
    ;
    Enzo Brunetti
    ;
    Pascual Catalan
    ;
    Juan Gabriel Sordo
    <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Mechanical Thrombectomy (MT) is the standard of care for treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke. Until the beginning of 2020 MT was not funded nor widely implemented at the public healthcare level in Chile. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p> To describe the results of a pilot program created to provide access to public MT in Santiago - Chile. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Analysis from a prospectively collected database of MT cases performed between September 2017 and September 2019 in one center. A stroke network was developed with a single MT capable stroke center and five primary stroke centers. The primary efficacy endpoint was the rate of functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days. Successful reperfusion was defined as 2 b-3 according to the thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale. Safety outcomes include the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 100 patients were treated over the study period. Their mean age was 62.8 ± 11.8 years and median baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) measurement was 17. Seventy-seven percent of the patients received intra venous thrombolysis. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 95% of the cases. NIHSS at 24 hours showed a median drop of 7 points from baseline (p &lt; 0.00001) and 50% of the follow-up patients were functionally independent at 90 days. Symptomatic Intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 5% of the patients and 90-day all case mortality was 11%. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> We demonstrated the feasibility of a publicly funded MT program in Chile, with similar results as other international randomized control trials. </jats:p></jats:sec>
    Scopus© Citations 10  4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Fighting Against Stroke in Latin America: A Joint Effort of Medical Professional Societies and Governments
    (2021)
    Sheila Cristina Ouriques Martins
    ;
    ;
    Thaís Leite Secchi
    ;
    Michael Brainin
    ;
    Sebastian Ameriso
    <jats:p><jats:bold>Introduction:</jats:bold> Stroke is one of the leading causes of death in Latin America, a region with countless gaps to be addressed to decrease its burden. In 2018, at the first Latin American Stroke Ministerial Meeting, stroke physician and healthcare manager representatives from 13 countries signed the Declaration of Gramado with the priorities to improve the region, with the commitment to implement all evidence-based strategies for stroke care. The second meeting in March 2020 reviewed the achievements in 2 years and discussed new objectives. This paper will review the 2-year advances and future plans of the Latin American alliance for stroke.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Method:</jats:bold> In March 2020, a survey based on the Declaration of Gramado items was sent to the neurologists participants of the Stroke Ministerial Meetings. The results were confirmed with representatives of the Ministries of Health and leaders from the countries at the second Latin American Stroke Ministerial Meeting.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> In 2 years, public stroke awareness initiatives increased from 25 to 75% of countries. All countries have started programs to encourage physical activity, and there has been an increase in the number of countries that implement, at least partially, strategies to identify and treat hypertension, diabetes, and lifestyle risk factors. Programs to identify and treat dyslipidemia and atrial fibrillation still remained poor. The number of stroke centers increased from 322 to 448, all of them providing intravenous thrombolysis, with an increase in countries with stroke units. All countries have mechanical thrombectomy, but mostly restricted to a few private hospitals. Pre-hospital organization remains limited. The utilization of telemedicine has increased but is restricted to a few hospitals and is not widely available throughout the country. Patients have late, if any, access to rehabilitation after hospital discharge.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> The initiative to collaborate, exchange experiences, and unite societies and governments to improve stroke care in Latin America has yielded good results. Important advances have been made in the region in terms of increasing the number of acute stroke care services, implementing reperfusion treatments and creating programs for the detection and treatment of risk factors. We hope that this approach can reduce inequalities in stroke care in Latin America and serves as a model for other under-resourced environments.</jats:p>
    Scopus© Citations 37  1
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    COVID-19 Lockdown Effects on Acute Stroke Care in Latin America
    (2021)
    Virginia A. Pujol-Lereis
    ;
    Alan Flores
    ;
    Miguel A. Barboza
    ;
    Carlos Abanto-Argomedo
    ;
    Pablo Amaya
    Scopus© Citations 12  4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    A Chilean Experience of Telestroke in a COVID-19 Pandemic Year
    <jats:p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Background and Purpose:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Telemedicine for stroke patients’ care (telestroke [TS]) has grown notably in recent decades and may offer advantages during health crisis. Hospital admissions related to stroke have decreased globally during the COVID-19 pandemic, but scarce information is available regarding the effect of COVID-19 in TS. Using a population-based TS registry, we investigated the impact of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout our TS network in Santiago, Chile. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; Stroke codes evaluated after the onset of COVID-19 restrictions in Chile (defined as March 15, 2020) were compared with those evaluated in 2019. We analyzed differences between number of stroke codes, thrombolysis rate, stroke severity, and time from the stroke onset to hospital admission. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; We observed that the number of stroke codes and the number of patients undergoing reperfusion therapy did not change significantly (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.669 and 0.415, respectively). No differences were found with respect to the median time from the stroke onset to admission (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.581) or in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.055). The decision-making-to-needle time was significantly shorter in the COVID-19 period (median 5 min [IQR 3–8], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &amp;#x3c; 0.016), but no significant changes were found at the other times. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt; This study demonstrates the potential of adapting TS to extreme situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the importance of establishing networks that facilitate patient access to quality treatments. </jats:p>
    Scopus© Citations 7  1
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Scopus© Citations 5  5
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Temporal Trends of Intravenous Thrombolysis Utilization in Acute Ischemic Stroke in a Prospective Cohort From 1998 to 2019: Modeling Based on Joinpoint Regression
    <jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>The frequency of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is lower than it should be in several regions of the world. It is unclear what interventions can produce significant improvements in IVT utilization. We aimed to investigate the temporal trends in IVT in AIS and identify changes in time that could be associated with specific interventions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We included patients with AIS who were admitted from January 1998 to December 2019 in our institution. To analyze trends in utilization and time points in which they changed, we performed a Joinpoint regression analysis. Interventions were assigned to a specific category according to the Behavior Change Wheel framework intervention function criteria.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 3,361 patients with AIS were admitted, among which 538 (16%) received IVT. There were 245 (45.5%) women, and the mean age and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores were 68.5 (17.2) years and 8 (interquartile range, 4–15), respectively. Thrombolysis use significantly increased by an average annual 7.6% (95% CI, 5.1–10.2), with one Joinpoint in 2007. The annual percent changes were.45% from 1998 to 2007 and 9.57% from 2007 to 2019, concurring with the stroke code organization, the definition of door-to-needle times as an institutional performance measure quality indicator, and the extension of the therapeutic window.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The IVT rates consistently increased due to a continuous process of protocol changes and multiple interventions. The implementation of a complex multidisciplinary intervention such as the stroke code, as well as the definition of a hospital quality control metric, were associated with a significant change in this trend.</jats:p></jats:sec>
      1Scopus© Citations 10
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Associations of Early Systolic Blood Pressure Control and Outcome After Thrombolysis-Eligible Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the ENCHANTED Study
    (2022)
    Xia Wang
    ;
    Jatinder S. Minhas
    ;
    Tom J. Moullaali
    ;
    Gian Luca Di Tanna
    ;
    Richard I. Lindley
    <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose:</jats:title> <jats:p>In thrombolysis-eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke, there is uncertainty over the most appropriate systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering profile that provides an optimal balance of potential benefit (functional recovery) and harm (intracranial hemorrhage). We aimed to determine relationships of SBP parameters and outcomes in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title> <jats:p>Post hoc analyzes of the ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study), a partial-factorial trial of thrombolysis-eligible and treated acute ischemic stroke patients with high SBP (150–180 mm Hg) assigned to low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) alteplase and intensive (target SBP, 130–140 mm Hg) or guideline-recommended (target SBP &lt;180 mm Hg) treatment. All patients were followed up for functional status and serious adverse events to 90 days. Logistic regression models were used to analyze 3 SBP summary measures postrandomization: attained (mean), variability (SD) in 1–24 hours, and magnitude of reduction in 1 hour. The primary outcome was a favorable shift on the modified Rankin Scale. The key safety outcome was any intracranial hemorrhage.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p> Among 4511 included participants (mean age 67 years, 38% female, 65% Asian) lower attained SBP and smaller SBP variability were associated with favorable shift on the modified Rankin Scale (per 10 mm Hg increase: odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71–0.82]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt;0.001 and 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76–0.98]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.025) respectively, but not for magnitude of SBP reduction (0.98, [0.93–1.04]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.564). Odds of intracranial hemorrhage was associated with higher attained SBP and greater SBP variability (1.18 [1.06–1.31]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.002 and 1.34 [1.11–1.62]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.002) but not with magnitude of SBP reduction (1.05 [0.98–1.14]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.184). </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>Attaining early and consistent low levels in SBP &lt;140 mm Hg, even as low as 110 to 120 mm Hg, over 24 hours is associated with better outcomes in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Registration:</jats:title> <jats:p> URL: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.clinicaltrials.gov">https://www.clinicaltrials.gov</jats:ext-link> ; Unique identifier: NCT01422616. </jats:p> </jats:sec>
    Scopus© Citations 26  3