CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 68
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    A Comparative Analysis of Universal and Sentinel Surveillance Data for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Insights From Argentina, Chile, and Mexico (2020–2022)
    (Oxford University Press (OUP), 2025-03-10)
    Lidia Redondo-Bravo
    ;
    Kinda Zureick
    ;
    Carla Voto
    ;
    Xaviera Molina Avendaño
    ;
    Laura Flores-Cisneros
    Scopus© Citations 2  5
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Machine learning-based identification of efficient and restrictive physiological subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome
    (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-03-01)
    Gabriela Meza-Fuentes
    ;
    ;
    Mario Barbé
    ;
    Ignacio Sánchez
    ;
    Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe condition with high morbidity and mortality, characterized by significant clinical heterogeneity. This heterogeneity complicates treatment selection and patient inclusion in clinical trials. Therefore, the objective of this study is to identify physiological subphenotypes of ARDS using machine learning, and to determine ventilatory variables that can effectively discriminate between these subphenotypes in a bedside setting with high performance, highlighting potential utility for future clinical stratification approaches.</jats:p> Methodology A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from our ICU, covering admissions from 2017 to 2021. The study included 224 patients over 18 years of age diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin criteria and undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Data on physiological and ventilatory variables were collected during the first 24 h IMV. We applied machine learning techniques to categorize subphenotypes in ARDS patients. Initially, we employed the unsupervised Gaussian Mixture Classification Model approach to group patients into subphenotypes. Subsequently, we applied supervised models such as XGBoost to perform root cause analysis, evaluate the classification of patients into these subgroups, and measure their performance.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Our models identified two ARDS subphenotypes with significant clinical differences and significant outcomes. Subphenotype Efficient (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 172) was characterized by lower mortality, lower clinical severity and presented a less restrictive pattern with better gas exchange compared to Subphenotype Restrictive (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 52), which showed the opposite. The models demonstrated high performance with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94, sensitivity of 94.2% and specificity of 87.5%, in addition to an F1 score of 0.85. The most influential variables in the discrimination of subphenotypes were distension pressure, respiratory frequency and exhaled carbon dioxide volume.Conclusion This study presents an approach to improve subphenotype categorization in ARDS. The generation of clustering and prediction models by machine learning involving clinical, ventilatory mechanics, and gas exchange variables allowed for more accurate stratification of patients. These findings have the potential to optimize individualized treatment selection and improve clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS.</jats:p> Graphical Abstract
    Scopus© Citations 2  5
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Concurrent nutrition and physical rehabilitation interventions for patients with critical illness
    (Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2024-12-16) ;
    Kirby P. Mayer
    ;
    Renee D. Stapleton
    The effects of either physical rehabilitation or nutrition on outcomes in patients with critical illness are variable and remain unclear. The potential for the combination of exercise and nutritional delivered concurrently to provide benefit is provocative, but data are only emerging. Herein, we provide a summary of evidence from 2023 and 2024 on combined physical rehabilitation and nutrition during and following critical illness. Recent findings While latest trials on physical rehabilitation alone reported conflicting findings, recent nutrition trials found no difference between higher and lower protein delivery and even suggested harm in patients with acute kidney injury. In 2023 and 2024, we identified four studies (one randomized controlled trial) combining physical rehabilitation and nutrition (mainly protein supplementation) within the ICU setting. Overall, these suggested benefits, including reduction of muscle size loss, ICU acquired weakness, delirium, and improved mobility levels, although these benefits did not extend to mortality and hospital length of stay. No recent trials combining physical rehabilitation and nutrition for patients after ICU were identified.</jats:p>
    Scopus© Citations 6  1
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Editorial: Immune response to gram-negative bacteria in the lungs
    (2024)
    Agnes Jara-Collao
    ;
    ;
    William Bain
    ;
    Hernán F. Peñaloza
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Early prediction of functional mobility severity after stroke: two key milestones
    (2024)
    Patricia Vargas
    ;
    Marcos Maldonado-Diaz
    ;
    Tania Gutiérrez-Panchana
    Scopus© Citations 2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Excess burden of antibiotic-resistant bloodstream infections: evidence from a multicentre retrospective cohort study in Chile, 2018–2022
    (2024)
    Kasim Allel
    ;
    Anne Peters
    ;
    Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli
    ;
    Maria Spencer-Sandino
    ;
    Jose Conejeros
    Scopus© Citations 2  4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Early high-sensitivity troponin elevation in predicting short-term mortality in sepsis: A protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis
    (2024)
    Santiago Ferrière-Steinert
    ;
    Joaquín Valenzuela Jiménez
    ;
    Sebastián Heskia Araya
    ;
    Thomas Kouyoumdjian
    ;
    José Ramos-Rojas
    <jats:sec id="sec001"> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Sepsis is a common admission diagnosis in the intensive care unit (ICU). The Sepsis-3 consensus associates sepsis diagnosis with acute organ dysfunction. In these patients troponin elevation is a well-established phenomenon, but its clinical significance is not settled, as no systematic review has addressed the prognostic significance of the increasingly prevalent high-sensitivity troponin assays in acute organ dysfunction setting.</jats:p> <jats:p>This study aims to clarify the association between early serum troponin levels in high-sensitivity assays with short-term mortality risk in septic patients with acute organ dysfunction.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec002"> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>We will systematically search PubMed, Scopus and Embase for original articles; additionally, a manual search will be carried out through relevant literature. Generally, studies will be deemed eligible for inclusion if they evaluate the association between high-sensitivity troponin in the first 24 hours of admission and ICU, 30-days, or In-hospital mortality; in patients with septic shock or sepsis related to acute organ dysfunction. Two reviewers will independently select studies and extract the data. A meta-analysis for mortality outcome will be performed for comparative data regarding two effect measures: Odd ratios and Standardized Mean differences.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec003"> <jats:title>Discussion</jats:title> <jats:p>This study will provide further evidence about the role of high-sensitivity troponin assays in predicting mortality in septic patients; potentially helping to guide further research and yielding valuable information for patient assessment.</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusion about the certainty of evidence will be presented in a ´Summary of findings´ table.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec id="sec004"> <jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title> <jats:p>PROSPERO registration:</jats:p> <jats:p>(<jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024468883" xlink:type="simple">CRD42024468883</jats:ext-link>).</jats:p> </jats:sec>
      8Scopus© Citations 3
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Daily compliance of the ABCDEF liberation bundle for patients in the intensive care unit: A retrospective descriptive study
    (2024)
    Felipe Muñoz-Muñoz
    ;
    ;
    Felipe González-Seguel
    ;
    <jats:p>Introduction Implementing the ABCDEF bundle has demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with critical illness. This study aims to describe the daily compliance of the ABCDEF bundle in a Chilean intensive care unit. Methods Retrospective observational study of electronic clinical records of nursing, physiotherapy, and medical professionals who cared for patients over 18 years of age, admitted to an intensive care unit for at least 24 hours, with or without mechanical ventilation. Daily bundle compliance was determined by considering the daily records for each element: Assess pain (element A), both spontaneous awakening trials (element B1) and spontaneous breathing trials (element B2), choice of sedation (element C), delirium assessment (element D), early mobilization (element E), and family engagement (element F). Results 4165 registered bundle elements were obtained from nursing (47%), physiotherapy (44%), and physicians (7%), including 1134 patient/days (from 133 patients). Elements E and C showed 67 and 40% compliance, while D, A, and B2 showed 24, 14 and 11%, respectively. For B1 and F, 0% compliance was achieved. Compliance was higher in patients without mechanical ventilation for A and E, while it was similar for D. Conclusions Early mobilization had the highest compliance, while spontaneous awakening trials and family engagement had absolute non-compliance. Future studies should explore the reasons for the different degrees of compliance per bundle element in clinical practice.</jats:p>
    Scopus© Citations 2  2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Early Mobilization Dose Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trials With Patients Who Were Mechanically Ventilated: A Scoping Review
    (2024)
    Felipe González-Seguel
    ;
    Renato Letelier-Bernal
    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Objective</jats:title> <jats:p>The aim of this scoping review was to investigate the mobilization dose reporting in the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>In this scoping review, RCTs published from inception to December 2022 were searched in relevant electronic databases. Trials that involved adults receiving mechanical ventilation (&amp;gt;48 hours) and any early mobilization modality were analyzed. Two independent authors screened, selected, and extracted data. The mobilization doses of the intervention groups (IGs) and the comparator groups (CGs) were assessed as the proportion of reported items/total applicable from the main items of the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Twenty-three RCTs comprising 2707 patients (1358 from IG and 1349 from CG) were included, involving studies on neuromuscular electrical stimulation (n = 7), progressive mobility (n = 6), leg cycling (n = 3), tilt table (n = 1), and multicomponent (n = 6) mobilization. The pooled reporting of CERT items was 68% (86% for IG and 50% for CG). The most reported CERT items were type of exercise (100%) and weekly frequency (100%) for IG, whereas the least reported were intensity (4%) and individualization (22%) for CG. Regardless of the group, individualization, progression, and intensity of mobilization were the least reported items. Eight IGs (35%) reported all CERT items, whereas no CGs reported all of them.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Deficits in mobilization dose reporting of intensive care unit RCTs were identified, especially for exercise intensity in adults receiving mechanical ventilation. One-third of IG reported all exercise dosing items, whereas no CG reported all of them. Future studies should investigate the details of optimal dosage reporting, particularly for CG.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Impact</jats:title> <jats:p>The lack of dose reporting may partially explain the inconsistency in the meta-analysis results of early mobilization trials, thus limiting the interpretation for clinical practice in the intensive care unit.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
      19Scopus© Citations 10