PONCE OLIVA, ROBERTO DANIEL
Preferred name
PONCE OLIVA, ROBERTO DANIEL
Main Affiliation
Email
robertoponce@udd.cl
ORCID
0000-0001-5024-7456
Scopus Author ID
57190574379
63 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 63
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Product, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Product, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Product, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Product, 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, POLICY DISCLOSURE AS A PREDICTOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR: EVIDENCE FROM THE CHILEAN RETAIL SECTOR(2024-06-01); ; This study examines the relationship between corporate environmental policy disclosures and firms' environmental investments. Using an endogenous switching probit (ESP) model to mitigate potential endogeneity issues, this study serves two purposes. Initially, it estimates the influence of six organizational characteristics-size, age, manager gender, export orientation, family ownership, and corporate group affiliation-on the probability of firms declaring pro-environmental policies. Subsequently, we test whether such policy disclosures are reliable predictors of environmental investment. We use the retail sector as a case study because of its pivotal role as an intermediary between primary producers, manufacturers, and consumers, thereby holding a uniquely influential position in driving sustainable consumption and production. Our results show a positive relationship between size, manager gender, export orientation, family ownership, and corporate group affiliation. In addition, we find that declaring an environmental policy positively affects the likelihood of businesses investing in environmental protection. This study contributes to the existing literature in three significant ways: it increases the evidence supporting a causal relationship between environmental policy disclosure and environmental investments; it is the first to explore this relationship within the retail industry; and it broadens our understanding of this dynamic in the context of developing countries.3Scopus© Citations 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Understanding the role of institutions and economic context on entrepreneurial value creation choice<jats:p>Research background: The observable discrepancies in entrepreneurship activity across countries have motivated both researchers and policymakers to comprehend the sources of these variations. Certain scholars have suggested that the answer to this empirical puzzle lies in the macrolevel processes that influence entrepreneurial endeavours. Purpose of the article: As the understanding of macrolevel processes that shape entrepreneurial behaviour is limited, this research aims to answer how institutions and the economic context influence entrepreneurial value creation choices (i.e., for-profit, non-profit, and mixed). Methods: Using a cross-country sample of 7,891 entrepreneurs in 58 countries, we employ a multilevel ordered probit to evaluate a novel conceptual framework. Our analysis models the direct impact of the regulative framework, the normative pillar, and the cultural pillar, alongside the moderating influence of income inequality and economic uncertainty on value creation choices. Findings & value added: Our findings show that the regulative framework has a positive marginal effect on for-profit and mixed-value creation, but a negative effect on non-profit value creation. Meanwhile, the normative pillar has a negative marginal effect on for-profit and mixed-value creation, but a positive effect on non-profit value creation. The cultural pillar has a negative marginal effect on for-profit and mixed-value creation, but a positive effect on non-profit value creation. Furthermore, income inequality moderates positive the relationship between normative pillar and for-profit and mixed-value creation, while economic uncertainty moderates negative the relationship between normative pillar and for-profit and mixed-value creation. Our research contributes to the literature by providing a nuanced understanding of how institutional pillars can act as drivers or barriers for different entrepreneurial forms, evidence of how uncertainty interacts with institutional forces to shape value creation decisions, and insights into the distinctive attributes of different entrepreneurial forms. Our findings have implications for public policy development.</jats:p>2Scopus© Citations 48 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, La Eficiencia de la producción de quinua en zonas altoandinas: el caso de Puno-Perú(2023); 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Product, Dataset - Trends in research on climate change and organizations: A bibliometric analysis (1999-2021) DatabaseDatabase of "Trends in research on climate change and organizations: A bibliometric analysis (1999-2021)". It contains the bibliometric information of publications in the intersection between Climate change and Organizations. Final Sample Size of 1476 articles.5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Renewable Energies: Research Trends, Gaps and the Challenge of Improving Participation(2021); ; Stefan Gelcich<jats:p>The global increase in renewable energy initiatives has been followed by the need to include the social impact of any project as a core element. Significant challenges for renewable energy development include uncertainty in assessing social impacts at local scales, participation and social acceptance. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approaches have been widely used in energy planning to address these challenges. This article reviews how social criteria and participation mechanisms have been incorporated into decision-making processes for renewable energy projects. A total of 184 articles were analyzed. A total of 490 indicators that estimated social impacts were identified and organized into nine criteria: employment, social acceptance, social development, health impact, governance, visual impact, knowledge and awareness, cultural value and social justice. Most research included analytical hierarchy process methodologies, and the articles were geographically concentrated in Asia and Europe. Most articles included a participative component (92.3%), and the majority of them were based on expert consultation (75.4%). Of the articles that exclusively considered experts, almost 40% did not provide any description of the expert elicitation process. Results revealed advances in the use of MCDA but highlighted important challenges—related to improving expert consultation methodologies and broadening the participation of stakeholders—when developing renewable energy initiatives and policies.</jats:p>Scopus© Citations 87 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Sensitivity of Water Price Elasticity Estimates to Different Data Aggregation Levels(2021); 3Scopus© Citations 15