CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Influence of renal function on blood pressure control and outcome in thrombolyzed patients after acute ischemic stroke: post-hoc analysis of the ENCHANTED trial(Frontiers Media SA, 2024-12-09) ;Xinwen Ren ;Chen Chen ;Xia Wang ;Qiang LiYang Zhao<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The effect of renal impairment in patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is unclear. We aimed to determine the associations of renal impairment and clinical outcomes and any modification of the effect of intensive versus guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) control in the BP arm of the International Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We conducted a <jats:italic>post-hoc</jats:italic> analysis of the ENCHANTED BP arm, which involved 2,196 thrombolyzed AIS patients. Logistic regression models were used to define the association between eGFR and clinical outcomes of death, death or major disability [modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores 3–6], and major disability (mRS 3–5) at 90 days.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of the 2,151 patients with available baseline renal function data (mean age 66.9 years; 38% women), 993 (46.2%), 822 (38.2%), and 336 (15.6%) had normal (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), mildly (60–89), and moderate-to-severely impaired (&lt;60) renal function, respectively. Compared with patients with normal eGFR, mortality was higher in those with moderate-to-severe renal impairment (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05–2.99; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.031 for trend). However, the difference in death or major disability (mRS 3–6) was not significant between groups. There was no heterogeneity in the effect of intensive versus guideline-recommended BP-lowering treatment on death by grades of renal function (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> for interaction = 0.545).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Discussion</jats:title><jats:p>The presence of moderate-to-severe renal impairment is associated with increased mortality in thrombolyzed patients with AIS. Renal function does not modify the effect of early intensive BP-lowering treatment on death in this patient group.</jats:p></jats:sec>2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering and Renal Function in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Secondary Analysis of the ENCHANTED Trial(2024) ;Chen Chen ;Xinwen Ren ;Yang Zhao ;Menglu OuyangQiang Li Mbiostat<jats:p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Renal failure is a major safety concern of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering. We aimed to determine the effect of this treatment on early change in renal function in participants of the international Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Post hoc analysis of the ENCHANTED BP-arm in which thrombolyzed patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were randomized to intensive (target 130–140 mm Hg within 1 h) or guideline-recommended (target &lt;180 mm Hg) management within 6 h of symptom onset. Primary outcome is the early change in renal function, defined by a difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (<b>∆</b>eGFR = 24 h – baseline eGFR), analyzed using linear regression with adjustment for clinical variables. Key SBP parameters were attained (mean), variability (standard deviation), and magnitude of reduction within 24 h. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 2,151 participants (mean age 66.9 years; 38% female) included with the available baseline eGFR, there were significant differences in attained 144.3 ± 10.2 versus 149.8 ± 12.0 [Δ5.5 mm Hg]; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), variation (15.1 ± 5.4 vs. 14.0 ± 5.6 mm Hg; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), and magnitude of reduction (44.6 ± 16.2 vs. 38.7 ± 17.6 mm Hg; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) in SBP within 24 h. 1,718 (79.9%) participants with complete follow-up eGFR were included in the primary analysis, and there was no significant difference in <b>∆</b>eGFR (adjusted mean difference −1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] −3.14 to −0.94; <i>p</i> = 0.29) between the intensive and guideline groups, respectively. The neutral effect on <b>∆</b>eGFR was consistent in patients with different baseline eGFR stages and in sensitivity analysis after multiple imputations for missing follow-up eGFR. SBP variability was significantly associated with decreasing <b>∆</b>eGFR (per 5 mm Hg increase by category: adjusted mean difference −1.35, 95% CI: −2.43 to −0.28; <i>p</i> for trend = 0.01). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Intensive SBP lowering with a target of 130–140 mm Hg had no impact on early renal function in thrombolyzed AIS patients. Wide SBP variability was associated with a larger decline in eGFR. </jats:p>1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Associations of Early Systolic Blood Pressure Control and Outcome After Thrombolysis-Eligible Acute Ischemic Stroke: Results From the ENCHANTED Study(2022) ;Xia Wang ;Jatinder S. Minhas ;Tom J. Moullaali ;Gian Luca Di TannaRichard I. Lindley<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose:</jats:title> <jats:p>In thrombolysis-eligible patients with acute ischemic stroke, there is uncertainty over the most appropriate systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering profile that provides an optimal balance of potential benefit (functional recovery) and harm (intracranial hemorrhage). We aimed to determine relationships of SBP parameters and outcomes in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods:</jats:title> <jats:p>Post hoc analyzes of the ENCHANTED (Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study), a partial-factorial trial of thrombolysis-eligible and treated acute ischemic stroke patients with high SBP (150–180 mm Hg) assigned to low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) or standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) alteplase and intensive (target SBP, 130–140 mm Hg) or guideline-recommended (target SBP <180 mm Hg) treatment. All patients were followed up for functional status and serious adverse events to 90 days. Logistic regression models were used to analyze 3 SBP summary measures postrandomization: attained (mean), variability (SD) in 1–24 hours, and magnitude of reduction in 1 hour. The primary outcome was a favorable shift on the modified Rankin Scale. The key safety outcome was any intracranial hemorrhage.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results:</jats:title> <jats:p> Among 4511 included participants (mean age 67 years, 38% female, 65% Asian) lower attained SBP and smaller SBP variability were associated with favorable shift on the modified Rankin Scale (per 10 mm Hg increase: odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.71–0.82]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> <0.001 and 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76–0.98]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.025) respectively, but not for magnitude of SBP reduction (0.98, [0.93–1.04]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.564). Odds of intracranial hemorrhage was associated with higher attained SBP and greater SBP variability (1.18 [1.06–1.31]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.002 and 1.34 [1.11–1.62]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.002) but not with magnitude of SBP reduction (1.05 [0.98–1.14]; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.184). </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title> <jats:p>Attaining early and consistent low levels in SBP <140 mm Hg, even as low as 110 to 120 mm Hg, over 24 hours is associated with better outcomes in thrombolyzed acute ischemic stroke patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Registration:</jats:title> <jats:p> URL: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.clinicaltrials.gov">https://www.clinicaltrials.gov</jats:ext-link> ; Unique identifier: NCT01422616. </jats:p> </jats:sec>Scopus© Citations 26 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 2Scopus© Citations 14 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Characteristics, management and response to alteplase in China versus non-China participants of the ENCHANTED trial(2017) ;Lily Song ;Xia Wang ;Thompson Robinson ;Richard I LindleyHisatomi Arima<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The characteristics of patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and their management vary across regions, which may influence outcomes. We examined for differential patterns of outcome between China and non-China participants of the ENhanced Control of Hypertension And Thrombolysis strokE stuDy (ENCHANTED), which tested different alteplase doses in AIS.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>ENCHANTED was an international, multicentre, open, blinded-endpoint trial of the effects of low-dose (0.6 mg/kg) versus standard-dose (0.9 mg/kg) intravenous alteplase on 90-day disability outcomes and symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage (sICH) in 3310 patients with AIS.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Participants (n=1419, 48%) in China were younger, and more often male, hypertensive and with prior stroke and coronary artery disease, but less likely to have atrial fibrillation and use antihypertensive, antithrombotic and lipid-lowering agents, compared with non-China patients with AIS. Although China participants had more AIS due to large artery occlusion, were treated later and had differing ancillary management, there was no significant difference in 90-day modified Rankin scale scores 2–6 (55.6% vs 47.8%; OR, adjusted for baseline and management factors 0.87 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.07; p=0.20)) and risk of sICH (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study criteria: 1.4% vs 1.8%; p=0.12) compared with non-China participants. There was no heterogeneity in the treatment effects of low-dose versus standard-dose alteplase between China and non-China participants.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Patients with AIS recruited to the ENCHANTED trial in China had similar outcomes in response to thrombolysis treatment despite significantly differing demographic, clinical and management factors to patients with AIS in other regions.</jats:p></jats:sec>5Scopus© Citations 8 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Applicability of ENCHANTED trial results to current acute ischemic stroke patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis in England and Wales: Comparison with the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme registry(2019) ;Thompson G Robinson ;Benjamin D Bray ;Lizz Paley ;Nikola SpriggXia Wang<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Randomized controlled trials provide high-level evidence, but the necessity to include selected patients may limit the generalisability of their results. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Comparisons were made of baseline and outcome data between patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) recruited into the alteplase-dose arm of the international, multi-center, Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke study (ENCHANTED) in the United Kingdom (UK), and alteplase-treated AIS patients registered in the UK Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) registry, over the study period June 2012 to October 2015. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> There were 770 AIS patients (41.2% female; mean age 72 years) included in ENCHANTED at sites in England and Wales, which was 19.5% of alteplase-treated AIS patients registered in the SSNAP registry. Trial participants were significantly older, had lower baseline neurological severity, less likely Asian, and had more premorbid symptoms, hypertension and atrial fibrillation. Although ENCHANTED participants had higher rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage than those in SSNAP, there were no differences in onset-to-treatment time, levels of disability (assessed by the modified Rankin scale) at hospital discharge, and mortality over 90 days between groups. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Despite the high level of participation, equipoise over the dose of alteplase among UK clinician investigators favored the inclusion of older, frailer, milder AIS patients in the ENCHANTED trial. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Clinical trial registration</jats:title><jats:p> Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01422616 </jats:p></jats:sec>5Scopus© Citations 1