CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1
Browse
12 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 12
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Risk and impact of stroke across 38 countries and territories of the Americas from 1990 to 2021: a population-based trends analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021(Elsevier BV, 2025-03) ;Ramón Martinez; ;Pedro Ordunez ;Felipe FregniCarlos AbantoScopus© Citations 22 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Predictive Accuracy of Clinicians Estimates of Death and Recovery after Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pre-Specified Analysis in INTERACT3 Study(2024) ;Menglu Ouyang ;Lu Ma ;Xiaoying Chen ;Xia WangLaurent Billot<jats:p>Introduction: Accurately predicting a patient’s prognosis is an important component of decision-making in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to determine clinicians’ ability to predict survival, functional recovery, and return to premorbid activities in patients with ICH. Methods: Pre-specified secondary analysis of the third intensive care bundle with blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral hemorrhage trial (INTERACT3), an international, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Clinician perspectives on prognosis were collected at hospital admission and Day 7 (or before discharge). Prognosis questions were the likelihood of (i) survival at 48 h and 6 months, (ii) favorable functional outcome (recovery walking and self-care), and (iii) return to usual activities at 6 months. Clinician predictions were compared with actual outcomes. Results: Most clinician participants were from neurosurgery (75%) with a median of 8 working years (IQR 5–14) of experience. Of the 6,305 randomized patients who survived 48 h, 213 (3.4%) were predicted to die (positive predictive value [PPV] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–0.99). Of 5,435 patients who survived 6 months, 209 (3.8%) were predicted to die (PPV 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92–0.93). Predictions on the favorable functional outcome (PPV 0.54, 95% CI: 0.52–0.56) and satisfied ability to return to usual activities (PPV 0.50, 95% CI: 0.49–0.52) were poor. Prediction accuracy varied by working years and region of practice. Conclusions: In patients with ICH, clinician estimates of death are very good but conversely they are poor in predicting higher levels of functional recovery and activities. </jats:p>1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Bundled care to optimize outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage: action for effective implementation(2023) ;Menglu OuyangCraig S. Anderson6 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, INTEnsive care bundle with blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral hemorrhage trial (INTERACT3): study protocol for a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial(2021) ;Lili Song ;Xin Hu ;Lu Ma ;Xiaoying ChenMenglu Ouyang<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Early intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering remains the most promising treatment for acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), despite discordant results between clinical trials and potential variation in the treatment effects by approach to control BP. As the third in a series of clinical trials on this topic, the INTEnsive care bundle with blood pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT3) aims to determine the effectiveness of a goal-directed care bundle protocol of early physiological control (intensive BP lowering, glycemic control, and pyrexia treatment) and reversal of anticoagulation, in acute ICH.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>INTERACT3 is a pragmatic, international, multicenter, stepped-wedge (4 phases/3 steps), cluster-randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a multifaceted care package in adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients (target 8360) with acute ICH (< 6 h of onset) recruited from 110 hospitals (average of 19 consecutive patients per phase) in low- and middle-income countries. After a control phase, each hospital implements the intervention (intensive BP lowering, target systolic < 140 mmHg; glucose control, target 6.1–7.8 mmol/L and 7.8–10.0 mmol/L in those without and with diabetes mellitus, respectively; anti-pyrexia treatment to target body temperature ≤ 37.5 °C; and reversal of anticoagulation, target international normalized ratio < 1.5 within 1 h). Information will be obtained on demographic and baseline clinical characteristics, in-hospital management, and 7-day outcomes. Central trained blinded assessors will conduct telephone interviews to assess physical function and health-related quality of life at 6 months. The primary outcome is the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 6 months analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. The sample size of 8360 subjects provides 90% power (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05) to detect a 5.6% absolute improvement (shift) in the primary outcome of the intervention versus control standard care, with various assumptions.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Discussion</jats:title> <jats:p>As the largest clinical trial in acute ICH, INTERACT3 is on schedule to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of a widely applicable goal-directed care bundle for a serious condition in which a clearly proven treatment has yet to be established.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title> <jats:p><jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://clinicaltrials.gov">ClinicalTrials.gov</jats:ext-link> NCT03209258. Registered on 1 July 2017. Chinese Trial Registry ChiCTR-IOC-17011787. Registered on 28 June 2017</jats:p> </jats:sec>Scopus© Citations 15 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Acute Treatment of Stroke (Except Thrombectomy)(2018); ;Jason P. Appleton ;Craig S. AndersonPhilip M. Bath4Scopus© Citations 5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Clinical Prediction Algorithm (BRAIN) to Determine Risk of Hematoma Growth in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage(2015) ;Xia Wang ;Hisatomi Arima ;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman ;Mark WoodwardEmma Heeley<jats:sec> <jats:title>Background and Purpose—</jats:title> <jats:p>We developed and validated a simple algorithm to predict the risk of hematoma growth in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to better inform clinicians and researchers in their efforts to improve outcomes for patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods—</jats:title> <jats:p>We analyzed data from the computed tomography substudies of the pilot and main phases of the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trials (INTERACT1 and 2, respectively). The study group was divided into a derivation cohort (INTERACT2, n=964) and a validation cohort (INTERACT1, n=346). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with clinically significant (≥6 mL) increase in hematoma volume at 24 hours after symptom onset. A parsimonious risk score was developed on the basis of regression coefficients derived from the logistic model.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results—</jats:title> <jats:p> A 24-point BRAIN score was derived from INTERACT2 (C-statistic, 0.73) based on baseline ICH volume (mL per score, ≤10=0, 10–20=5, >20=7), recurrent ICH (yes=4), anticoagulation with warfarin at symptom onset (yes=6), intraventricular extension (yes=2), and number of hours to baseline computed tomography from symptom onset (≤1=5, 1–2=4, 2–3=3, 3–4=2, 4–5=1, >5=0) predicted the probability of ICH growth (ranging from 3.4% for 0 point to 85.8% for 24 points) with good discrimination (C-statistic, 0.73) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> =0.82) in INTERACT1. </jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions—</jats:title> <jats:p>The simple BRAIN score predicts the probability of hematoma growth in ICH. This could be used to improve risk stratification for research and clinical practice.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Clinical Trial Registration—</jats:title> <jats:p> URL: <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">http://www.clinicaltrials.gov</jats:ext-link> . Unique identifier: NCT00226096 and NCT00716079. </jats:p> </jats:sec>3Scopus© Citations 117 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Poor utility of grading scales in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: results from the INTERACT2 trial(2015) ;Emma Heeley ;Craig S. Anderson ;Mark Woodward ;Hisatomi ArimaThompson Robinson<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Several simple clinical grading scores have been developed for intracerebral hemorrhage, primarily to predict 30-day mortality. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p> We aimed to determine the accuracy of three popular scores (original intracerebral hemorrhage, modified intracerebral hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage grading scale) on 30-day mortality and 90-day death or major disability, and whether the magnitude of benefit varies according to prognosis graded by the three predictive scores. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Data from the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial which included 2839 intracerebral hemorrhage patients (<6 hours) and elevated systolic blood pressure (150–220 mmHg), randomized to intensive (target systolic blood pressure <140 mmHg) or guideline-based (<180 mmHg) blood pressure management. Discrimination of scales for predicting death and poor outcome (modified Rankin scale 3–6) was evaluated in area under receiver operator characteristic curves. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Among 2556 (90%) participants with available data, the modified intracerebral hemorrhage had the highest discrimination (receiver operator characteristic 0·75) for 90-day poor outcome compared with the original intracerebral hemorrhage (receiver operator characteristic 0·68) and intracerebral hemorrhage grading scale (receiver operator characteristic 0·69). All scores had good positive predictive value (approximately 80–90%) for poor outcome but poor sensitivity and positive predictive value for death. The scores do not clearly discriminate a patient group most likely to benefit from blood pressure lowering. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Intracerebral hemorrhage prognostic scores are not useful in defining patients at high probability of early death, but they are reliable for predicting poor outcome, defined by death or major disability. Potential benefits of early intensive blood pressure lowering are broadly applicable across grades of severity defined by such scores. </jats:p></jats:sec>7Scopus© Citations 23 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Prognostic Significance of Hyponatremia in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pooled Analysis of the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial Studies(2016) ;Cheryl Carcel ;Shoichiro Sato ;Danni Zheng ;Emma HeeleyHisatomi Arima8Scopus© Citations 41 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Rapid Blood Pressure Lowering According to Recovery at Different Time Intervals after Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Pooled Analysis of the INTERACT Studies(2015) ;Xia Wang ;Hisatomi Arima ;Rustam Al-Shahi Salman ;Mark WoodwardEmma Heeley<jats:p><b><i>Background and Purpose:</i></b> Early intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering has been shown to improve functional outcome in acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but the treatment effect is modest and without a clearly defined underlying explanatory mechanism. We aimed at more reliably quantifying the benefits of this treatment according to different time periods in the recovery of participants in the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage Trial (INTERACT) studies. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pooled analysis of the pilot INTERACT1 (n = 404) and main INTERACT2 (n = 2,839) involving patients with spontaneous ICH (<6 h) and elevated systolic BP (SBP 150-220 mm Hg) who were randomized to intensive (target SBP <140 mm Hg) or guideline-recommended (target SBP <180 mm Hg) BP lowering treatment. Treatment effects were examined according to repeated measures analysis of an ordinal (‘shift') across all 7 levels of the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assessed during follow-up at 7, 28, and 90 days, post-randomization. Clinical trial registration information: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00226096 and NCT00716079. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Intensive BP lowering resulted in a significant favorable distribution of mRS scores for better functioning (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.26; p = 0.042) over 7, 28 and 90 days, and the effect was consistency for early (7-28 days) and later (28-90 days) time periods (p homogeneity 0.353). Treatment effects were also consistent across several pre-specified patient characteristic subgroups, with trends favoring those randomized early, and with higher SBP and milder neurological severity at baseline. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Intensive BP lowering provides beneficial effects on physical functioning that manifests consistently through the early and later phases of recovery from ICH.</jats:p>Scopus© Citations 23 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 2Scopus© Citations 14