CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 38
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Polygenic score analysis identifies distinct genetic risk profiles in Alzheimer’s disease comorbidities
    (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-04-03)
    Carlos F. Hernández
    ;
    Camilo Villaman
    ;
    Costin Leu
    ;
    Dennis Lal
    ;
    Ignacio Mata
      4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Manejo del dolor agudo y crónico en pacientes ancianos
    (Asociacion de Medicos Anestesiologos de Chile, 2024)
    Josefina Yates
    ;
    Martín Lacassie
    ;
    Eduardo Vega Pérez
    ;
    Antonia Cárdenas
    ;
    Cristóbal Pedemonte
      6
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    The Persistence of Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis
    (2024)
    Magdalena Jasmen
    ;
    Dominga García
    ;
    ;
    Pamela Díaz
    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Drug persistence is a crucial measure of long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction. Lack of persistence can increase healthcare costs and morbidity and mortality rates. This review aimed to consolidate available data on drug persistence for various biological treatments used as the primary intervention for psoriatic arthritis and identify factors associated with nonpersistence. Reports indicate variable 1-year persistence rates for biologic therapies, ranging from 37% to 73%. Specifically, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have shown fluctuating 1-year persistence rates ranging from 32% to 85%. IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrate persistence rates of 25% to 89%, whereas data for IL-17 and JAK inhibitors are more limited, ranging from 51% to 77%. Factors such as female sex and a higher burden of comorbidities have been associated with an increased risk of nonpersistence, although evidence regarding other factors remains scarce. The significant variability in reported persistence rates may be attributed to differences in treatment gaps and methodologies across studies. Addressing and mitigating the factors leading to nonpersistence is essential for improving treatment outcomes in psoriatic arthritis.</jats:p>
    Scopus© Citations 1  1
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Scopus© Citations 1  2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Increased mortality in hospital- compared to community-onset carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales infections
    (2024)
    Angelique E Boutzoukas
    ;
    Natalie Mackow
    ;
    Abhigya Giri
    ;
    Lauren Komarow
    ;
    Carol Hill
    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>The CDC reported a 35% increase in hospital-onset (HO) carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections during the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated patient outcomes following HO and community-onset (CO) CRE bloodstream infections (BSI).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Patients prospectively enrolled in CRACKLE-2 from 56 hospitals in 10 countries between 30 April 2016 and 30 November 2019 with a CRE BSI were eligible. Infections were defined as CO or HO by CDC guidelines, and clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared. The primary outcome was desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) 30 days after index culture. Difference in 30-day mortality was calculated with 95% CI.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Among 891 patients with CRE BSI, 65% were HO (582/891). Compared to those with CO CRE, patients with HO CRE were younger [median 60 (Q1 42, Q3 70) years versus 65 (52, 74); P &amp;lt; 0.001], had fewer comorbidities [median Charlson comorbidity index 2 (1, 4) versus 3 (1, 5); P = 0.002] and were more acutely ill (Pitt bacteraemia score ≥4: 47% versus 32%; P &amp;lt; 0.001). The probability of a better DOOR outcome in a randomly selected patient with CO BSI compared to a patient with HO BSI was 60.6% (95% CI: 56.8%–64.3%). Mortality at 30-days was 12% higher in HO BSI (192/582; 33%) than CO BSI [66/309 (21%); P &amp;lt; 0.001].</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>We found a disproportionately greater impact on patient outcomes with HO compared to CO CRE BSIs; thus, the recently reported increases in HO CRE infections by CDC requires rigorous surveillance and infection prevention methods to prevent added mortality.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
    Scopus© Citations 1  3
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Long-term quality of life in patients with bariatric surgery evaluated with BAROS
    (2024)
    Ana Palacio Agüero
    ;
    Ximena Díaz-Torrente
    ;
    Camila Zancheta
    ;
    Alejandra Reyes
    ;
    Marcela Cosentino
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Variations in management of A3 and A4 cervical spine fractures as designated by the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System
    (2022)
    Barry Ting Sheen Kweh
    ;
    Jin Wee Tee
    ;
    Sander Muijs
    ;
    F. Cumhur Oner
    ;
    Klaus John Schnake
    <jats:sec> <jats:title>OBJECTIVE</jats:title> <jats:p>Optimal management of A3 and A4 cervical spine fractures, as defined by the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System, remains controversial. The objectives of this study were to determine whether significant management variations exist with respect to 1) fracture location across the upper, middle, and lower subaxial cervical spine and 2) geographic region, experience, or specialty.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS</jats:title> <jats:p>A survey was internationally distributed to 272 AO Spine members across six geographic regions (North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East). Participants’ management of A3 and A4 subaxial cervical fractures across cervical regions was assessed in four clinical scenarios. Key characteristics considered in the vignettes included degree of neurological deficit, pain severity, cervical spine stability, presence of comorbidities, and fitness for surgery. Respondents were also directly asked about their preferences for operative management and misalignment acceptance across the subaxial cervical spine.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS</jats:title> <jats:p>In total, 155 (57.0%) participants completed the survey. Pooled analysis demonstrated that surgeons were more likely to offer operative intervention for both A3 (p &lt; 0.001) and A4 (p &lt; 0.001) fractures located at the cervicothoracic junction compared with fractures at the upper or middle subaxial cervical regions. There were no significant variations in management for junctional incomplete (p = 0.116) or complete (p = 0.342) burst fractures between geographic regions. Surgeons with more than 10 years of experience were more likely to operatively manage A3 (p &lt; 0.001) and A4 (p &lt; 0.001) fractures than their younger counterparts. Neurosurgeons were more likely to offer surgical stabilization of A3 (p &lt; 0.001) and A4 (p &lt; 0.001) fractures than their orthopedic colleagues. Clinicians from both specialties agreed regarding their preference for fixation of lower junctional A3 (p = 0.866) and A4 (p = 0.368) fractures. Overall, surgical fixation was recommended more often for A4 than A3 fractures in all four scenarios (p &lt; 0.001).</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS</jats:title> <jats:p>The subaxial cervical spine should not be considered a single unified entity. Both A3 and A4 fracture subtypes were more likely to be surgically managed at the cervicothoracic junction than the upper or middle subaxial cervical regions. The authors also determined that treatment strategies for A3 and A4 subaxial cervical spine fractures varied significantly, with the latter demonstrating a greater likelihood of operative management. These findings should be reflected in future subaxial cervical spine trauma algorithms.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
      17Scopus© Citations 3
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Bullying and its relationship with the drug use and eating disorders: a comparison between Chilean and Spanish adolescents
    (2015)
    Carmona-Torres, Jose A.
    ;
    Adolfo J. Cangas
    ;
    Langer, Alvaro I.
    ;
    Aguilar-Parra, Jose M.
    ;
    Gallego, Jose
      2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Prognostic significance of early urinary catheterization after acute stroke: Secondary analyses of the international HeadPoST trial
    (2020)
    Menglu Ouyang
    ;
    Laurent Billot
    ;
    Lili Song
    ;
    Xia Wang
    ;
    Christine Roffe
    <jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> An indwelling urinary catheter (IUC) is often inserted to manage bladder dysfunction, but its impact on prognosis is uncertain. We aimed to determine the association of IUC use on clinical outcomes after acute stroke in the international, multi-center, cluster crossover, Head Positioning in Acute Stroke Trial (HeadPoST). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Data were analyzed on HeadPoST participants (n = 11,093) randomly allocated to the lying-flat or sitting-up head position. Binomial, logistic regression, hierarchical mixed models were used to determine associations of early insertion of IUC within seven days post-randomization and outcomes of death or disability (defined as “poor outcome,” scores 3–6 on the modified Rankin scale) and any urinary tract infection at 90 days with adjustment of baseline and post-randomization management covariates. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Overall, 1167 (12%) patients had an IUC, but the frequency and duration of use varied widely across patients in different regions. IUC use was more frequent in older patients, and those with vascular comorbidity, greater initial neurological impairment (on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), and intracerebral hemorrhage as the underlying stroke type. IUC use was independently associated with poor outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.74), but not with urinary tract infection after adjustment for antibiotic treatment and stroke severity at hospital separation (aOR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.59–2.18). The number exposed to IUC for poor outcome was 13. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> IUC use is associated with a poor outcome after acute stroke. Further studies are required to inform appropriate use of IUC. </jats:p></jats:sec>
    Scopus© Citations 4  3
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Scopus© Citations 12  1