UDD Logo
CRIS - Current Research Information System
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
Researchers
Datasets
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model
Details

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Fixation Methods for Percutaneous Extracapsular Transverse Cervical Metatarsal Osteotomy in a Hallux Valgus Sawbone Model

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
ISSN
2473-0114
Date Issued
2024-10
Author(s)
WAGNER HITSCHFELD, PABLO  
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
WAGNER HITSCHFFELD, EMILIO  
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Miguel Pinochet
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
David Salinas
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Peter Lam
Type
journal-article
DOI
10.1177/24730114241303768
URL
https://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/10573
Abstract
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> There is limited literature available that provide information about fixation methods for minimally invasive hallux valgus osteotomies. Our objective was to evaluate the strength of different fixation methods for a percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal (PTCM) osteotomy in a sawbone model. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> Thirty solid foam sawbone foot models were used. Percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal osteotomies were performed and fixed in a standardized fashion in 6 different groups: (1) one 4.0-mm screw; (2) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) parallel screws; (3) 2 (one 4.0-mm and one 3.0-mm) divergent screws; (4) same as group 3, but with lateral metatarsal head cortex purchase with the 4.0-mm screw; (5) same as group 4, but with two 4.0-mm screws; (6) same as group 5, but with two 3.5-mm screws. Cyclic and load to failure testing were performed applying a plantar load to the metatarsal head. The measured variables were stiffness and force needed to create deformity using a Zwick Roell Universal Testing Machine. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> Group 1 failed as a result of rotational instability in cyclic testing. In load to failure testing, group 3 did not achieve difference compared with group 2 ( P = .09) (181 vs 131 N). Group 4 was stronger ( P = .02) (250 N) than groups 1-3. Group 5 did not show differences relative to group 4 ( P = .1) (223 N). Group 6 was stronger only than groups 1 and 2 ( P = .01) (193 N). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> In this sawbones-based study, we found that the use of two 4.0-mm screws or use of a 3.0-mm screw and a 4.0-mm screw with lateral first metatarsal head cortical purchase was superior to other screw configurations. </jats:p></jats:sec>
Subjects
biomechanics

; 

hallux disorders

; 

hallux valgus

; 

mica

; 

minimally invasive

; 

ankle fracture

; 

anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

; 

article

; 

biomechanics

; 

hallux valgus

; 

human

; 

metatarsal bone

; 

metatarsal osteotomy

; 

percutaneous extracapsular transverse cervical metatarsal osteotomy
Logo Universidad de Desarrollo
Encuéntranos en:

Sede Santiago

Av. Plaza 680, Las Condes

Contacto|Mapa

Sede Concepción

Ainavillo 456, Concepción

Contacto|Mapa

Hosting & SupportLogo Scimago Lab

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify