UDD Logo
CRIS - Current Research Information System
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
Researchers
Datasets
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Incidence of and Functional Significance of Floating Toe After Weil Osteotomy
Details

Incidence of and Functional Significance of Floating Toe After Weil Osteotomy

Journal
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
ISSN
2473-0114
2473-0114
Date Issued
2019
Author(s)
WAGNER, EMILIO  
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Luis A. O’Connell
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Ruben Radkievich
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Nathaly Caicedo
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Pablo Mococain
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
WAGNER HITSCHFELD, PABLO  
Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo  
Type
Resource Types::text::journal::journal article
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85108267224
DOI
10.1177/2473011419891956
URL
https://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/6167
Abstract
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> The most frequent complication after Weil osteotomies is a floating toe deformity, but there are no reports about its effect on the patient. In this study, we analyzed the consequences of floating toe deformities after the performance of a modified Weil osteotomy (MWO) or a modified Weil osteotomy with interphalangeal fixation (MWOIF). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> We performed a retrospective review with a prospective follow-up of 50 patients (98% women, 120 rays) who underwent MWO (65 rays) or MWOIF (55 rays), with a mean age of 54 ± 12 years and a minimum follow-up of 4 years (mean of 6 years). We analyzed the presence of floating toe deformity in MWO and MWOIF and the outcomes measured by the subjective satisfaction, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and quality of prehension force between patients with or without floating toe deformity. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> The mean floating toe incidence was of 57%, with no significant difference between operative techniques (48% MWO, 67% MWOIF; P = .053). Our analysis did not show differences in satisfaction, LEFS and AOFAS scores, or grip strength between the group of patients with or without floating toes. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> The presence of a floating toe deformity was more frequent than generally believed but did not have a meaningful impact on the patient’s satisfaction or functional outcomes measured by the AOFAS and LEFS scales. There was no clear correlation between operative technique, floating toe, and quality of prehension force. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Level of Evidence:</jats:title><jats:p> Level III, retrospective comparative series. </jats:p></jats:sec>
Subjects
floating toe

; 

interphalangeal fixation

; 

modified weil osteotomy

; 

satisfaction
Logo Universidad de Desarrollo
Encuéntranos en:

Sede Santiago

Av. Plaza 680, Las Condes

Contacto|Mapa

Sede Concepción

Ainavillo 456, Concepción

Contacto|Mapa

Hosting & SupportLogo Scimago Lab

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify