SCHILLING REDLICH, ANDREA INGRID
Preferred name
SCHILLING REDLICH, ANDREA INGRID
Main Affiliation
Email
aschilling@udd.cl
ORCID
0000-0002-8339-779X
Scopus Author ID
7101797606
22 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 22
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Product, 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Safety Profile of the 9-Valent HPV Vaccine: A Combined Analysis of 7 Phase III Clinical Trials(2016) ;Edson D. Moreira ;Stan L. Block ;Daron Ferris ;Anna R. GiulianoOle-Erik Iversen<jats:sec> <jats:title>OBJECTIVES:</jats:title> <jats:p>The overall safety profile of the 9-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV) vaccine was evaluated across 7 Phase III studies, conducted in males and females (nonpregnant at entry), 9 to 26 years of age.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Vaccination was administered as a 3-dose regimen at day 1, and months 2 and 6. More than 15 000 subjects received ≥1 dose of 9vHPV vaccine. In 2 of the studies, &gt;7000 control subjects received ≥1 dose of quadrivalent HPV (qHPV) vaccine. Serious and nonserious adverse events (AEs) and new medical conditions were recorded throughout the study. Subjects testing positive for pregnancy at day 1 were not vaccinated; those who became pregnant after day 1 were discontinued from further vaccination until resolution of the pregnancy. Pregnancies detected after study start (n = 2950) were followed to outcome.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS:</jats:title> <jats:p>The most common AEs (≥5%) experienced by 9vHPV vaccine recipients were injection-site AEs (pain, swelling, erythema) and vaccine-related systemic AEs (headache, pyrexia). Injection-site AEs were more common in 9vHPV vaccine than qHPV vaccine recipients; most were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Discontinuations and vaccine-related serious AEs were rare (0.1% and &lt;0.1%, respectively). Seven deaths were reported; none were considered vaccine related. The proportions of pregnancies with adverse outcome were within ranges reported in the general population.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS:</jats:title> <jats:p>The 9vHPV vaccine was generally well tolerated in subjects aged 9 to 26 years with an AE profile similar to that of the qHPV vaccine; injection-site AEs were more common with 9vHPV vaccine. Its additional coverage and safety profile support widespread 9vHPV vaccination.</jats:p> </jats:sec>1Scopus© Citations 98 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Three-Year Follow-up of 2-Dose Versus 3-Dose HPV Vaccine(2021) ;Jacob Bornstein ;Surita Roux ;Lone Kjeld Petersen ;Li-Min HuangSimon R. Dobson<jats:sec> <jats:title /> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:</jats:title> <jats:p>Human papillomavirus (HPV) antibody responses to the 9-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV) vaccine among girls and boys (aged 9–14 years) receiving 2-dose regimens (months 0, 6 or 0, 12) were noninferior to a 3-dose regimen (months 0, 2, 6) in young women (aged 16–26 years) 4 weeks after last vaccination in an international, randomized, open-label trial (NCT01984697). We assessed response durability through month 36.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>METHODS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Girls received 2 (months 0 and 6 [0, 6]: n = 301; months 0 and 12 [0, 12]: n = 151) or 3 doses (months 0,2, and 6 [0, 2, 6]: n = 301); boys received 2 doses ([0, 6]: n = 301; [0, 12]: n = 150); and young women received 3 doses ([0, 2, 6]: n = 314) of 9vHPV vaccine. Anti-HPV geometric mean titers (GMTs) were assessed by competitive Luminex immunoassay (cLIA) and immunoglobulin G-Luminex immunoassay (IgG-LIA) through month 36.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>RESULTS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Anti-HPV GMTs were highest 1 month after the last 9vHPV vaccine regimen dose, decreased sharply during the subsequent 12 months, and then decreased more slowly. GMTs 2 to 2.5 years after the last regimen dose in girls and boys given 2 doses were generally similar to or greater than GMTs in young women given 3 doses. Across HPV types, most boys and girls who received 2 doses (cLIA: 81%–100%; IgG-LIA: 91%–100%) and young women who received 3 doses (cLIA: 78%–98%; IgG-LIA: 91%–100%) remained seropositive 2 to 2.5 years after the last regimen dose.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>CONCLUSIONS:</jats:title> <jats:p>Antibody responses persisted through 2 to 2.5 years after the last dose of a 2-dose 9vHPV vaccine regimen in girls and boys. In girls and boys, antibody responses generated by 2 doses administered 6 to 12 months apart may be sufficient to induce high-level protective efficacy through at least 2 years after the second dose.</jats:p> </jats:sec>13 1Scopus© Citations 18 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Influenza vaccines promote humoral and cellular immune responses: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-12-07) ;Linmar Rodríguez-Guilarte ;Constanza Méndez ;Antonia Reyes ;Mariana RiosFrancisca RománScopus© Citations 2 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Impact of Vaccines Across the Lifespan: A New Perspective in Public Health—Conclusions of an Expert Panel—Part 1(MDPI AG, 2026-02-15) ;Roberto Debbag ;María L. Ávila-Agüero ;José Brea ;Carlos EspinalRodrigo Romero-Feregrino<jats:p>Population aging is the most significant demographic transformation of the 21st century, reshaping health systems, economies, and societies. The biological processes of immunosenescence and inflammaging weaken host defenses, reduce vaccine effectiveness, and increase vulnerability to infectious and chronic diseases. These changes underscore the urgent need for preventive strategies that extend beyond childhood immunization. Vaccination is a cornerstone of healthy aging, capable of preventing infections and has been associated with reductions in systemic inflammation, frailty, and loss of functional independence in later life. Furthermore, new insights into vaccine-mediated immunomodulation, including trained immunity, adjuvanted formulations, and epigenetic reprogramming, highlight the evolving role of vaccines as modulators of immune fitness across the lifespan. This first part of our review examines the intersection of aging and immunity, as well as the potential of vaccines to address these challenges. Part 2 will expand on specific vaccines, proposed vaccination schedules, and global perspectives for lifelong immunization.</jats:p>2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Characterizing adolescent vaccination in publicly funded national immunization programs in Latin America and the Caribbean: A review of the literature(Informa UK Limited, 2025-07-11) ;Monica Rojas ;Maria Florencia Lución ;Ricardo Becker Feijó ;Antonio LuevanosIvan Felipe Gutierrez Tobar1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Prevalence and management of condylomas in consulting population in Chile: "DIACON study" [Prevalencia y manejo de condilomas en poblacion consultante en Chile: estudio "DIACON"](2019) ;Andrea Schilling R. ;Andrea Huneeus V. ;Alejandra Massoc P. ;Francisca Rivera M.Gabriel Cavada Ch.1Scopus© Citations 3 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Safety and Non-Inferiority Evaluation of Two Immunization Schedules with an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial(2022) ;Katia Abarca ;Carolina Iturriaga ;Marcela Urzúa ;Nicole Le CorreAugusto Pineda<jats:p>Several vaccines have been developed to control the COVID-19 pandemic. CoronaVac®, an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, has demonstrated safety and immunogenicity, preventing severe COVID-19 cases. We investigate the safety and non-inferiority of two immunization schedules of CoronaVac® in a non-inferiority trial in healthy adults. A total of 2302 healthy adults were enrolled at 8 centers in Chile and randomly assigned to two vaccination schedules, receiving two doses with either 14 or 28 days between each. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were solicited adverse events (AEs) within 7 days of each dose, and comparing the number of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection 14 days after the second dose between the schedules, respectively. The most frequent local AE was pain at the injection site, which was less frequent in participants aged ≥60 years. Other local AEs were reported in less than 5% of participants. The most frequent systemic AEs were headache, fatigue, and myalgia. Most AEs were mild and transient. There were no significant differences for local and systemic AEs between schedules. A total of 58 COVID-19 cases were confirmed, and all but 2 of them were mild. No differences were observed in the proportion of COVID-19 cases between schedules. CoronaVac® is safe, especially in ≥60-year-old participants. Both schedules protected against COVID-19 hospitalization.</jats:p>1 2Scopus© Citations 9 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Adolescents find it easy to collect their own samples to study sexually transmitted infections(2017) ;ANDREA HUNEEUS VERGARA; ; ;Paulina ParraAleksandra Zakharova13 1Scopus© Citations 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Immunogenicity of the 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine: Post hoc analysis from five phase 3 studies(Informa UK Limited, 2025-01-22) ;Anna R. Giuliano ;Joel M. Palefsky ;Stephen E. Goldstone ;Jacob BornsteinIlse De CosterScopus© Citations 8 2
- «
- 1 (current)
- 2
- 3
- »