PANIAGUA PRIETO, PABLO IGNACIO
Preferred name
PANIAGUA PRIETO, PABLO IGNACIO
Main Affiliation
Email
ppaniagua@udd.cl
ORCID
0000-0002-1579-6203
19 results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 19
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Democracy’s attention problem(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2026-06-26) ;Martínez, Eduardo J. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Polycentric democracy and dynamic political stability<jats:p>A perennial question of political thought is how to stabilize a just regime in the face of disagreement. The importance of this question has been heightened with the Weberian state that monopolizes the power of coercion and anchors society under a single governance structure. This political form has given us both liberal democracy and totalitarianism. The stakes could not be higher in ensuring stability without dismantling pluralism. This paper provides a novel solution to the stability problem by focusing on dynamic stability reached through polycentric democracy. Plural and overlapping centers of governance characterize such democracy. This renders a polycentric system more resilient to changing views than a monocentric one and superior on political risk-management grounds by diffusing decision-making risks. A polycentric system also fosters antifragility in society by avoiding seeking a single and fixed point equilibrium, thereby eluding the pitfalls currently afflicting liberal democracy.</jats:p>1Scopus© Citations 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Bespoke science: the use of ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2025-06-19) ;Roger Koppl ;Kira Pronin ;Nick Cowen ;Marta Podemska-MikluchMany governments formed ad hoc scientific advisory committees in the Covid-19 pandemic because they offered the government greater control over policy advice than standing agencies. The difference between ad hoc and standing advisory bodies has been little noted in the literature. High-uncertainty crises demanding expertise and requiring action from the national government increase the value of policy discretion, raising the value of controlling the scientific narrative. An ad hoc body is generally easier to control than a standing body because policymakers have greater liberty to choose its members, specify its mandate, and disband and reconstitute it when needed. Control generally requires either a narrow membership or a narrow mandate. If members cannot be chosen to be reliably aligned with the government or its policy preferences, a narrow mandate will restrain the committee from offering undesired advice or analysis. Our argument builds on the public choice assumption of motivational symmetry: The choices of scientists and politicians are shaped by the same motives and desires that influence individuals in any other sphere of life. Our case studies of Italy, UK, US, Poland, Uganda, and Sweden support our theory.3Scopus© Citations 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Earthquakes and divergent economic recovery: case studies of Chile and New Zealand(Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2026-08-17) ;Díaz, Diego A.; - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, 3