CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 43

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Evidence-based clinical standard for the diagnosis and treatment of invasive lung aspergillosis in the patient with oncohematologic disease
(Elsevier BV, 2025-03)
Jorge Alberto Cortés
;
Diego Andrés Rodríguez-Lugo
;
Martha Carolina Valderrama-Rios
;
Ricardo Rabagliati
;
Domenico Capone
2
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Conventional Radiotherapy Timing and Wound Complication Avoidance After Surgery for Metastatic Spine Disease. A LatAm Modified Delphi Study
(Elsevier BV, 2025-03)
Federico Landriel
;
Kevin White
;
Fernando Padilla Lichtenberger
;
Alfredo Guiroy
;
Alisson Teles
2
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Consenso de recomendaciones para tamizaje del cáncer pulmonar en Chile
(2024)
Francisco Suárez V.
;
María Paz Saavedra V.
;
Javier Roberti
;
Iris Boyeras
;
Mariana Seijo
1
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Criteria and Indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Global Consensus Facilitated by ISRRA
(2024)
Rachel C. Stockley
;
Marion F. Walker
;
Margit Alt Murphy
;
Noor Azah Abd Aziz
;
Philemon Amooba
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> The aim of the International Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Alliance is to create a world where worldwide collaboration brings major breakthroughs for the millions of people living with stroke. A key pillar of this work is to define globally relevant criteria for centers that aspire to deliver excellent clinical rehabilitation and generate exceptional outcomes for patients. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p> This paper presents consensus work conducted with an international group of expert stroke recovery and rehabilitation researchers, clinicians, and people living with stroke to identify and define criteria and measurable indicators for Centers of Clinical Excellence (CoCE) in stroke recovery and rehabilitation. These were intentionally developed to be ambitious and internationally relevant, regardless of a country’s development or income status, to drive global improvement in stroke services. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Criteria and specific measurable indicators for CoCE were collaboratively developed by an international panel of stroke recovery and rehabilitation experts from 10 countries and consumer groups from 5 countries. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> The criteria and associated indicators, ranked in order of importance, focused upon (i) optimal outcome, (ii) research culture, (iii) working collaboratively with people living with stroke, (iv) knowledge exchange, (v) leadership, (vi) education, and (vii) advocacy. Work is currently underway to user-test the criteria and indicators in 14 rehabilitation centers in 10 different countries. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> We anticipate that use of the criteria and indicators could support individual organizations to further develop their services and, more widely, provide a mechanism by which clinical excellence can be articulated and shared to generate global improvements in stroke care. </jats:p></jats:sec>
1Scopus© Citations 5
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Cross-cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index questionnaire in Spanish (UWRI-S)
(2022)
JOSEFINA BUNSTER GUZMAN
;
María Jesús Martínez
;
MANUEL VICENTE MAURI STECCA
;
LEPPE ZAMORA, JAIME ESTEBAN
;
Evan O. Nelson
Scopus© Citations 6 5
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Latin American consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in people with multiple sclerosis treated with disease modifying drugs
(2023)
Berenice A. Silva
;
Edgar Carnero Contentti
;
Jefferson Becker
;
José I Carranza
;
Patricio E Correa-Díaz
Scopus© Citations 10
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
International Expert Consensus on US Lexicon for Thyroid Nodules
(2023)
Cosimo Durante
;
Laszlo Hegedüs
;
Dong Gyu Na
;
Enrico Papini
;
Jennifer A. Sipos
6Scopus© Citations 61
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Primer Consenso Chileno de Grupo de Estudio de Tuberculosis Ocular
(2023)
Cristhian A. Urzua
;
Paulina Liberman
;
Nadia Escobar
;
Pablo Sabat
;
Mariluz Hernández
9Scopus© Citations 1
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Estado actual del diagnóstico de la displasia del desarrollo de las caderas en el siglo XXI
(2023)
Lizbet Pérez
;
Javier Besomi
;
Isabel Fuentealba
20Scopus© Citations 2
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Assessment of redundancy, methodological and reporting quality, and potential discrepancies of results of systematic reviews of early mobilisation of critically ill adults: a meta-research protocol
(2023)
Ruvistay Gutierrez-Arias
;
Dawid Pieper
;
Peter Nydahl
;
Felipe González-Seguel
;
Yorschua Jalil
<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Several systematic reviews (SRs) have been conducted to determine the effectiveness of early mobilisation in critically ill adults with heterogeneous methodology and results. Redundancy in conducting SRs, unclear justification when leading new SRs or updating, and discordant results of SRs on the same research question may generate research waste that makes it difficult for clinicians to keep up to date with the best available evidence. This meta-research aims to assess the redundancy, methodological and reporting quality, and potential reasons for discordance in the results reported by SRs conducted to determine the effectiveness of early mobilisation in critically ill adult patients.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods and analysis</jats:title><jats:p>A meta-research of early mobilisation SRs in critically ill adult patients will be conducted. A search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos and other search resources will be conducted. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction and quality appraisal. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer. The redundancy of SRs will be assessed by the degree of overlap of primary studies. In addition, the justification for conducting new SRs will be evaluated with the ‘Evidence-Based Research’ framework. The methodological quality of the SRs will be assessed with the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 tool, and the quality of the reports through compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. To assess the potential reasons for discordance in the results of the SRs considering divergence in results and their interpretation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Ethics and dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>As meta-research, this study does not involve the participation of people whose rights may be violated. However, this overview will be developed rigorously and systematically to achieve valid and reliable results. The findings of this meta-research study will be presented at conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal related to rehabilitation, critical care or research methodology.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>osf.io/kxwq9.</jats:p></jats:sec>

CRIS

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results