CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1
Browse
4 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The role of astrocytes in depression, its prevention, and treatment by targeting astroglial gliotransmitter release(2024) ;Yorley Duarte ;Daisy Quintana-Donoso ;Rodrigo Moraga-Amaro ;Ivanka DinamarcaYordan Lemunao<jats:p>The role of ventral hippocampus (vHipp) astroglial gliotransmission in depression was studied using chronic restraint stress (CRS) and chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) rodent models. CRS increased Cx43 hemichannel activity and extracellular glutamate levels in the vHipp and blocking astroglial Cx43 hemichannel-dependent gliotransmission during CRS prevented the development of depression and glutamate buildup. Moreover, the acute blockade of Cx43 hemichannels induced antidepressant effects in rats previously subjected to CRS or CUMS. This antidepressant effect was prevented by coinjection of glutamate and D-serine. Furthermore, Cx43 hemichannel blockade decreased postsynaptic NMDAR currents in vHipp slices in a glutamate and D-serine-dependent manner. Notably, chronic microinfusion of glutamate and D-serine, L-serine, or the NMDAR agonist NMDA, into the vHipp induced depressive-like symptoms in nonstressed rats. We also identified a small molecule, cacotheline, which blocks Cx43 hemichannels and its systemic administration induced rapid antidepressant effects, preventing stress-induced increases in astroglial Cx43 hemichannel activity and extracellular glutamate in the vHipp, without sedative or locomotor side effects. In conclusion, chronic stress increases Cx43 hemichannel-dependent release of glutamate and D-/L-serine from astrocytes in the vHipp, overactivating postsynaptic NMDARs and triggering depressive-like symptoms. This study highlights the critical role of astroglial gliotransmitter release in chronic stress-induced depression and suggests it can be used as a target for the prevention and treatment of depression.</jats:p>Scopus© Citations 5 8 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium(2021) ;Gustavo H. Vázquez ;Anees Bahji; ;Leonardo TondoRoss J. Baldessarini<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> Successful treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, and failures ("treatment-resistant depression" [TRD]) are frequent. Steps to address TRD include increasing antidepressant dose, combining antidepressants, adding adjunctive agents, or using nonpharmacological treatments. Their relative efficacy and tolerability remain inadequately tested. In particular, the value and safety of increasingly employed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and new esketamine, compared to lithium as antidepressant adjuncts remain unclear. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> We reviewed randomized, placebo-controlled trials and used random-effects meta-analysis to compare odds ratio (OR) versus placebo, as well as numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) and to-harm (NNH), for adding SGAs, esketamine, or lithium to antidepressants for major depressive episodes. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> Analyses involved 49 drug-placebo pairs. By NNT, SGAs were more effective than placebo (NNT = 11 [CI: 9–15]); esketamine (7 [5–10]) and lithium (5 [4–10]) were even more effective. Individually, aripiprazole, olanzapine+fluoxetine, risperidone, and ziprasidone all were more effective (all NNT < 10) than quetiapine (NNT = 13), brexpiprazole (16), or cariprazine (16), with overlapping NNT CIs. Risk of adverse effects, as NNH for most-frequently reported effects, among SGAs versus placebo was 5 [4–6] overall, and highest with quetiapine (NNH = 3), lowest with brexpiprazole (19), 5 (4–6) for esketamine, and 9 (5–106) with lithium. The risk/benefit ratio (NNH/NNT) was 1.80 (1.25–10.60) for lithium and much less favorable for esketamine (0.71 [0.60–0.80]) or SGAs (0.45 [0.17–0.77]). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p> Several modern antipsychotics and esketamine appeared to be useful adjuncts to antidepressants for acute major depressive episodes, but lithium was somewhat more effective and better tolerated. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Limitations:</jats:title><jats:p> Most trials of adding lithium involved older, mainly tricyclic, antidepressants, and the dosing of adjunctive treatments were not optimized. </jats:p></jats:sec>30Scopus© Citations 66 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Antidepressant use among immigrants with depressive disorder living in Finland: A register-based study(2022) ;Valentina Kieseppä; ;Heidi Taipale ;Minna HolmMarkus Jokela15Scopus© Citations 6 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Melancholia: does this ancient concept have contemporary utility?(2020) ;Gabriele Sani ;Leonardo Tondo; ;Gustavo H. VázquezPaola SalvatoreScopus© Citations 10 3