Nontraditional Data in Pandemic Preparedness and Response: Identifying and Addressing First- and Last-Mile Challenges
Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
ISSN
1438-8871
Date Issued
2026-04-29
Author(s)
Mattia Mazzoli
Irma Varela-Lasheras
Sónia Namorado
Constantino Pereira Caetano
Andreia Leite
Lisa Hermans
Niel Hens
Polen Türkmen
Kyriaki Kalimeri
Ciro Cattuto
Daniela Paolotti
Stefaan Verhulst
Type
journal-article
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>The COVID-19 pandemic served as an important test case of complementing traditional public health data with nontraditional data, such as mobility traces, social media activity, and wearable data, to inform real-time decision-making. Drawing on an expert workshop and a targeted survey of epidemic modelers in Europe, this study assesses the promise and the persistent limitations of such data in pandemic preparedness and response. We distinguish between “first-mile” challenges (obstacles to accessing and harmonizing data) and “last-mile” challenges (difficulties in translating insights into actionable policy interventions). The expert workshop, convened in March 2024 in Brussels, brought together 50 participants, including public health professionals, data scientists, policymakers, and industry leaders, to reflect on lessons learned and define strategies for better integration of nontraditional data into epidemic modeling and policymaking. The accompanying survey, gathering experiences from 29 modelers, offers empirical evidence of the barriers faced by modelers during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights areas where key data were unavailable or underused. The experiences collected through the survey and workshop resulted in ten key actions and three overarching recommendations for public entities, data providers, and stakeholders. Our findings reveal ongoing issues with data access, quality, and interoperability, as well as institutional and cognitive barriers to evidence-based decision-making. Approximately 66% of all datasets had at least one access problem, with data sharing reluctance for nontraditional sources being double that of traditional data (30% vs 15%). Only 10% of respondents reported that they could use all the data they needed. These limitations included issues related to timeliness and granularity of data, as well as issues with linkage, comparability, and biases. To overcome these hurdles, we propose a set of enabling mechanisms, including data inventories, standardization protocols, simulation exercises, data stewardship roles, and data collaboratives. For first-mile challenges, solutions focus on technical and legal frameworks for data access. For last-mile challenges, we recommend fusion centers, decision accelerator laboratories, and networks of scientific ambassadors to bridge the gap between analysis and action. We argue that realizing the full value of nontraditional data requires a sustained investment in institutional readiness, cross-sectoral collaboration, and a shift toward a culture of data solidarity. Grounded in the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic, the study can be used to design a roadmap for using nontraditional data to confront a broader array of public health emergencies, from climate shocks to humanitarian crises.</jats:p>
<jats:p>The COVID-19 pandemic served as an important test case of complementing traditional public health data with nontraditional data, such as mobility traces, social media activity, and wearable data, to inform real-time decision-making. Drawing on an expert workshop and a targeted survey of epidemic modelers in Europe, this study assesses the promise and the persistent limitations of such data in pandemic preparedness and response. We distinguish between “first-mile” challenges (obstacles to accessing and harmonizing data) and “last-mile” challenges (difficulties in translating insights into actionable policy interventions). The expert workshop, convened in March 2024 in Brussels, brought together 50 participants, including public health professionals, data scientists, policymakers, and industry leaders, to reflect on lessons learned and define strategies for better integration of nontraditional data into epidemic modeling and policymaking. The accompanying survey, gathering experiences from 29 modelers, offers empirical evidence of the barriers faced by modelers during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlights areas where key data were unavailable or underused. The experiences collected through the survey and workshop resulted in ten key actions and three overarching recommendations for public entities, data providers, and stakeholders. Our findings reveal ongoing issues with data access, quality, and interoperability, as well as institutional and cognitive barriers to evidence-based decision-making. Approximately 66% of all datasets had at least one access problem, with data sharing reluctance for nontraditional sources being double that of traditional data (30% vs 15%). Only 10% of respondents reported that they could use all the data they needed. These limitations included issues related to timeliness and granularity of data, as well as issues with linkage, comparability, and biases. To overcome these hurdles, we propose a set of enabling mechanisms, including data inventories, standardization protocols, simulation exercises, data stewardship roles, and data collaboratives. For first-mile challenges, solutions focus on technical and legal frameworks for data access. For last-mile challenges, we recommend fusion centers, decision accelerator laboratories, and networks of scientific ambassadors to bridge the gap between analysis and action. We argue that realizing the full value of nontraditional data requires a sustained investment in institutional readiness, cross-sectoral collaboration, and a shift toward a culture of data solidarity. Grounded in the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic, the study can be used to design a roadmap for using nontraditional data to confront a broader array of public health emergencies, from climate shocks to humanitarian crises.</jats:p>