Risk Factors for Failure of Non-operative Management in Isolated Unilateral Non-displaced Facet Fractures of the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Journal
Global Spine Journal
ISSN
2192-5682
2192-5690
Date Issued
2024
Author(s)
Ignacio Cirillo
Guillermo Alejandro Ricciardi
Juan Pablo Cabrera
Felipe Lopez Muñoz
Lyanne Romero Valverde
Andrei Joaquim
Charles Carazzo
Type
journal-article
Abstract
<jats:sec><jats:title>Study Design</jats:title><jats:p> systematic review. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p> To evaluate risk factors associated with failure of non-operative management of isolated unilateral facet fractures of the subaxial cervical spine in neurologically intact patients. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted in order to determine risk factors associated with failure of non-operative management in isolated unilateral facet fractures of the subaxial cervical spine without facet and/or vertebral displacement, in neurologically intact patients. Our research was in line with the PRISMA Statement and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023405699). </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 1639 studies were identified through a database search on May 5, 2023. In total, 7 studies from the databases were included, along with 1 study found through a manual citation search. The evidence showed high clinical heterogeneity, a serious risk of bias according to the ROBINS-I tool, and a predominance of retrospective cohort studies. In comparison to less complex facet fractures, lateral floating mass fractures were found to have 5.41 times higher odds of failure of non-operative management (OR = 5.41; 95% CI = 1.32, 22.19). We calculated the potential association between lower absolute fracture height and non-operative treatment success [Fracture height (percentage) Mean Difference = −17.51 (−28.22, −6.79 95% CI); Absolute height Mean Difference: −0.46 (−0.60, −0.31 95% CI)]. Other risk factors were not included in the meta-analysis due to lack of data. The level of certainty was rated as “very low”. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> Lateral floating mass cervical facet fractures and larger fracture fragment size (measured either in absolute terms or as a percentage) are significant risk factors for failure of non-operative treatment. </jats:p></jats:sec>