UDD Logo
CRIS - Current Research Information System
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
Researchers
Datasets
Statistics
  1. Home
  2. CRIS
  3. Publications
  4. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Psychometric Properties and Discriminative Capacity in Several Chilean Samples
Details

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Psychometric Properties and Discriminative Capacity in Several Chilean Samples

Journal
Evaluation & the Health Professions
ISSN
0163-2787
Date Issued
2019
Author(s)
Pablo Vera-Villarroel
Alfonso Urzúa
Daniela Jaime
Daniela Contreras
Izabela Zych
Karem Celis-Atenas
SILVA CONCHA, JAIME  
Facultad de Psicología  
Sebastian Lillo
Type
Resource Types::text::journal::journal article
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-85046026873
WoS ID
WOS:000485316400004
DOI
10.1177/0163278717745344
URL
https://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/4423
URL Institutional Repository
http://hdl.handle.net/11447/3515
Abstract
<jats:p> We evaluated the factor structure, reliability, and discriminative capacity of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) questionnaire in four different samples: two general adult populations ( N = 1,548, N = 964), one adolescent population ( N = 1,044), and young people with depressive symptomatology ( N = 307). Exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) were performed with subsamples from Studies 1 ( n = 773) and 2 ( n = 527), finding that the two- and three-factor solutions had a good fit. In a confirmatory factor analysis, the two-factor solution resulted in an adequate fit in a second set of subsamples from both studies ( n = 775, n = 517). In Study 3, we found good convergent and divergent validity with adequate and significant correlations found for depression (Beck’s Depression Inventory), anxiety (State–Trait Anxiety Inventory), and neuroticism and extroversion (Big Five Inventory). In Study 4, the results of an EFA performed in a subsample ( n = 154) found that the two- and three-factor solutions were appropriate with the former solution being confirmed in a second subsample ( n = 153). Reliability was α = .85 for positive affect and α = .87 for negative affect. The PANAS questionnaire showed adequate indicators of validity and reliability in adult and adolescent populations as well as in a sample with depressive symptoms. </jats:p>
Project(s)
Evaluación de variables predictivas del bienestar: un análisis contextual y episódico para la psicología positiva  
Subjects
panas

; 

depressive symptomatology

; 

negative affect

; 

positive affect

; 

psychometrics properties

; 

adolescent

; 

adult

; 

affect

; 

chile

; 

depression

; 

factor analysis, statistical

; 

female

; 

humans

; 

male

; 

middle aged

; 

psychiatric status rating scales

; 

psychometrics

; 

reproducibility of results

; 

self report

; 

adolescent

; 

adult

; 

affect

; 

chile

; 

depression

; 

factor analysis

; 

female

; 

human

; 

male

; 

middle aged

; 

psychological rating scale

; 

psychology

; 

psychometry

; 

reproducibility

; 

self report
Logo Universidad de Desarrollo
Encuéntranos en:

Sede Santiago

Av. Plaza 680, Las Condes

Contacto|Mapa

Sede Concepción

Ainavillo 456, Concepción

Contacto|Mapa

Hosting & SupportLogo Scimago Lab

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify