Public Policies and Type of Insurance Are Associated With the Burden of Bladder Cancer–Related Inpatient Health Care in Chile: A Two-Decade Analysis

Ignacio Eltit; Joaquín Cristi; DELGADO BECERRA, OROZIMBA IRIS; Paula Huerta; Sergio Fuentes; Alberto Bustamante; Mario I. Fernández

doi:10.48083/ZNKI7577

Public Policies and Type of Insurance Are Associated With the Burden of Bladder Cancer–Related Inpatient Health Care in Chile: A Two-Decade Analysis

Journal

Société Internationale d’Urologie Journal

ISSN

2563-6499

Date Issued

2023

Author(s)

Ignacio Eltit

Joaquín Cristi

DELGADO BECERRA, OROZIMBA IRIS

Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo

Paula Huerta

Sergio Fuentes

Alberto Bustamante

Mario I. Fernández

Type

Resource Types::text::journal::journal article

DOI

10.48083/ZNKI7577

URL

https://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/9253

Abstract

ObjectiveTo quantify changes in the burden of bladder cancer (BC) inpatient health care in Chile between 2001 and 2019, focusing on the impact of public policies and the type of medical insurance (public or private) held by patients.MethodsWe retrospectively collected national data on hospital discharges and calculated raw and adjusted hospitalization rates for the period of 2001 to 2019 categorized by sex and age. Additionally, we analyzed length of hospital stays, outcomes of surgical interventions, and discharge conditions based on the type of medical insurance — public: FONASA; private: ISAPRE. We also evaluated the impact of public policies such as the GES (“garantías explícitas en salud”) program, which ensures opportunities and access to medical attention, financial protection, and quality of care for a subset of diseases.ResultsA total of 34 100 hospital discharges were analyzed. Most patients were men (71%), and median age was 69 years. Of the patients, 91.3% had some kind of medical insurance, either private or public. Within this subset, 71.3% had public medical insurance (FONASA) and 23.2% had private medical insurance (ISAPRE). Patients on FONASA had significantly higher levels of overall surgery-related mortality (0.83% vs. 0.2%) and significantly longer median hospital stays (4 days vs. 2 days) compared to patients on ISAPRE. Following the implementation of the GES program in 2013, we observed an increase in transurethral resections and a reduction in radical cystectomies among publicly insured patients.ConclusionsThe type of medical insurance has a significant impact on the burden of BC-related inpatient health care in Chile, reflecting a significant disparity in terms of health care. The implementation of public policies such as the GES program can play a key role in reducing this gap between public and private medical insurance systems, especially in underdeveloped countries.