MELIPILLAN ARANEDA, EDMUNDO ROBERTO
Thumbnail Image
Preferred name
MELIPILLAN ARANEDA, EDMUNDO ROBERTO
Main Affiliation
Email
rmelipillan@udd.cl
ORCID
Scopus Author ID
57206186919

Research Output

2024 2024 2023 2023 2022 2022 2021 2021 2020 2020 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.0

Filters

4
4
Reset filters

Settings
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Improving Anchoring Vignette Methodology in Health Surveys with Image Vignettes

2022 , Mengyao Hu , Sunghee Lee , Hongwei Xu , MELIPILLAN ARANEDA, EDMUNDO ROBERTO , Jacqui Smith , Arie Kapteyn

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

EXAMINING MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE OF DEPRESSION AMONG MALE AND FEMALE IN CHINESE OLDER ADULTS

2022 , Mengyao Hu , MELIPILLAN ARANEDA, EDMUNDO ROBERTO

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Contextualizing the revised Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC-R) scale in primary healthcare settings: a validity and reliability evaluation study

2024 , Yiyuan Cai , Pengfei Guo , Jiong Tu , Mengyao Hu , Lingrui Liu , Bridget L. Ryan , Jing Liao , Rubee Dev , Yiran Li , Tianyu Huang , Ruilin Wang , Li Kuang , Ruonan Huang , Xinfang Li , MELIPILLAN ARANEDA, EDMUNDO ROBERTO , Shuaixiang Zhao , Wenjun He , Xiaohui Wang , Nan Zhang , Dong Xu

Abstract Background An English version of the Patient Perception of Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) scale was recently revised, and it is necessary to test this instrument in different primary care populations. Aim This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of the PPPC scale. Design A mixed method was used in this study. The Delphi method was used to collect qualitative and quantitative data to address the content validity of the PPPC scale by calculating the Content Validity Index, Content Validity Ratio, the adjusted Kappa, and the Item Impact Score. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were used to assess the construct validity of the PPPC scale through a cross-sectional survey. The internal consistency was also assessed. Setting/participants In the Delphi consultation, seven experts were consulted through a questionnaire sent by email. The cross-sectional survey interviewed 188 outpatients in Guangzhou city and 108 outpatients in Hohhot City from community health service centers or stations face-to-face. Results The 21 items in the scale were relevant to their component. The Item-level Content Validity Index for each item was higher than 0.79, and the average Scale-level content validity index was 0.97 in each evaluation round. The initial proposed 4-factor CFA model did not fit adequately. Still, we found a 3-factor solution based on our EFA model and the validation via the CFA model (model fit: $${\chi }^{2}=294.573$$ χ 2 = 294.573 , P < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.044, CFI = 0.981; factor loadings: 0.553 to 0.888). Cronbach's α also indicated good internal consistency reliability: The overall Cronbach's α was 0.922, and the Cronbach's α for each factor was 0.851, 0.872, and 0.717, respectively. Conclusions The Chinese version of the PPPC scale provides a valuable tool for evaluating patient-centered medical service quality.

View
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Response Patterns in a Multi-day Diary Survey: Implications for Adaptive Survey Design

2020 , Mengyao Hu , MELIPILLAN ARANEDA, EDMUNDO ROBERTO , Brady T. West , John A. Kirlin , Ilse Paniagua

View