Research Output

2023 2023 2022 2022 2021 2021 2020 2020 2019 2019 2018 2018 2017 2017 2016 2016 2015 2015 2014 2014 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.0
Now showing 1 - 10 of 14
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

A game-theoretic model of reciprocity and trust that incorporates personality traits

2020 , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , Rodrigo Harrison , Nureya Abarca , Mauricio G. Villena

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

The Ecosystems of Simple and Complex Societies: Social and Geographical Dynamics

2018 , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , Sammy Drobny , RODRÍGUEZ SICKERT, CARLOS ANDRÉS

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Exploring External Validity of Common Pool Resource Experiments: Insights from Artisanal Benthic Fisheries in Chile

2013 , Stefan Gelcich , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , RODRÍGUEZ SICKERT, CARLOS ANDRÉS , Juan Carlos Castilla , Juan Camilo Cárdenas

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Euvoluntariness and just market exchange: moral dilemmas from Locke’s Venditio

2013 , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , Michael C. Munger

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values

2022 , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , BARBATO EPPLE, MARÍA TERESA , Daniel Sznycer , Leda Cosmides

How does the mind make moral judgments when the only way to satisfy one moral value is to neglect another? Moral dilemmas posed a recurrent adaptive problem for ancestral hominins, whose cooperative social life created multiple responsibilities to others. For many dilemmas, striking a balance between two conflicting values (a compromise judgment) would have promoted fitness better than neglecting one value to fully satisfy the other (an extreme judgment). We propose that natural selection favored the evolution of a cognitive system designed for making trade-offs between conflicting moral values. Its nonconscious computations respond to dilemmas by constructing “rightness functions”: temporary representations specific to the situation at hand. A rightness function represents, in compact form, an ordering of all the solutions that the mind can conceive of (whether feasible or not) in terms of moral rightness. An optimizing algorithm selects, among the feasible solutions, one with the highest level of rightness. The moral trade-off system hypothesis makes various novel predictions: People make compromise judgments, judgments respond to incentives, judgments respect the axioms of rational choice, and judgments respond coherently to morally relevant variables (such as willingness, fairness, and reciprocity). We successfully tested these predictions using a new trolley-like dilemma. This dilemma has two original features: It admits both extreme and compromise judgments, and it allows incentives—in this case, the human cost of saving lives—to be varied systematically. No other existing model predicts the experimental results, which contradict an influential dual-process model.

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

The Economics of Social Stratification in Premodern Societies

2014 , ROBERT ROWTHORN , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , RODRÍGUEZ SICKERT, CARLOS ANDRÉS

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

The Evolution of Moral Cognition

2018 , Leda Cosmides , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , John Tooby

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

The Neolithic Revolution from a price-theoretic perspective

2011 , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , Weisdorf, Jacob

No Thumbnail Available
Product

Dataset - A moral trade-off system produces intuitive judgments that are rational and coherent and strike a balance between conflicting moral values

2021 , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , BARBATO EPPLE, MARÍA TERESA

Data and scripts for moral tradeoff system paper in PNAS

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Effects of experience with access regimes on stewardship behaviors of small‐scale fishers

2021 , María I. Rivera‐Hechem , GUZMÁN PRICE, RICARDO , RODRÍGUEZ SICKERT, CARLOS ANDRÉS , Stefan Gelcich