Research Output

2022 2022 2021 2021 2020 2020 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.0
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
No Thumbnail Available
Publication

The Confidence Database

2020 , Dobromir Rahnev , Kobe Desender , Alan L. F. Lee , William T. Adler , David Aguilar-Lleyda , Başak Akdoğan , Polina Arbuzova , Lauren Y. Atlas , Fuat Balcı , Ji Won Bang , Indrit Bègue , Damian P. Birney , Timothy F. Brady , Joshua Calder-Travis , Andrey Chetverikov , Torin K. Clark , Karen Davranche , Rachel N. Denison , Troy C. Dildine , Kit S. Double , Yalçın A. Duyan , Nathan Faivre , Kaitlyn Fallow , Elisa Filevich , Thibault Gajdos , Regan M. Gallagher , Vincent de Gardelle , Sabina Gherman , Nadia Haddara , Marine Hainguerlot , Tzu-Yu Hsu , Xiao Hu , Iñaki Iturrate , Matt Jaquiery , Justin Kantner , Marcin Koculak , Mahiko Konishi , Christina Koß , Peter D. Kvam , Sze Chai Kwok , Maël Lebreton , Karolina M. Lempert , Chien Ming Lo , Liang Luo , Brian Maniscalco , Antonio Martin , Sébastien Massoni , Julian Matthews , Audrey Mazancieux , Daniel M. Merfeld , Denis O’Hora , Eleanor R. Palser , Borysław Paulewicz , Michael Pereira , Caroline Peters , Marios G. Philiastides , Gerit Pfuhl , Fernanda Prieto , Manuel Rausch , Samuel Recht , REYES MUÑOZ, GABRIEL EDUARDO , Marion Rouault , Jérôme Sackur , Saeedeh Sadeghi , Jason Samaha , Tricia X. F. Seow , Medha Shekhar , Maxine T. Sherman , Marta Siedlecka , Zuzanna Skóra , Chen Song , David Soto , Sai Sun , Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel , Shuo Wang , Christoph T. Weidemann , Gabriel Weindel , Michał Wierzchoń , Xinming Xu , Qun Ye , Jiwon Yeon , Futing Zou , Ariel Zylberberg

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Metacognitive improvement: Disentangling adaptive training from experimental confounds.

2022 , Martin Rouy , Vincent de Gardelle , REYES MUÑOZ, GABRIEL EDUARDO , Jérôme Sackur , Jean Christophe Vergnaud , Elisa Filevich , Nathan Faivre

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Hydrocortisone decreases metacognitive efficiency independent of perceived stress

2020 , REYES MUÑOZ, GABRIEL EDUARDO , VIVANCO CARLEVARI, ANASTASSIA BELEN , Franco Medina , Carolina Manosalva , Vincent de Gardelle , Jérôme Sackur , SILVA CONCHA, JAIME

AbstractIt is well established that acute stress produces negative effects on high level cognitive functions. However, these effects could be due to the physiological components of the stress response (among which cortisol secretion is prominent), to its psychological concomitants (the thoughts generated by the stressor) or to any combination of those. Our study shows for the first time that the typical cortisol response to stress is sufficient to impair metacognition, that is the ability to monitor one’s own performance in a task. In a pharmacological protocol, we administered either 20 mg hydrocortisone or placebo to 46 male participants, and measured their subjective perception of stress, their performance in a perceptual task, and their metacognitive ability. We found that hydrocortisone selectively impaired metacognitive ability, without affecting task performance or creating a subjective state of stress. In other words, the single physiological response of stress produces a net effect on metacognition. These results inform our basic understanding of the physiological bases of metacognition. They are also relevant for applied or clinical research about situations involving stress, anxiety, depression, or simply cortisol use.

No Thumbnail Available
Publication

Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition

2022 , Dobromir Rahnev , Tarryn Balsdon , Lucie Charles , Vincent de Gardelle , Rachel Denison , Kobe Desender , Nathan Faivre , Elisa Filevich , Stephen M. Fleming , Janneke Jehee , Hakwan Lau , Alan L. F. Lee , Shannon M. Locke , Pascal Mamassian , Brian Odegaard , Megan Peters , REYES MUÑOZ, GABRIEL EDUARDO , Marion Rouault , Jerome Sackur , Jason Samaha , Claire Sergent , Maxine T. Sherman , Marta Siedlecka , David Soto , Alexandra Vlassova , Ariel Zylberberg

Despite the tangible progress in psychological and cognitive sciences over the last several years, these disciplines still trail other more mature sciences in identifying the most important questions that need to be solved. Reaching such consensus could lead to greater synergy across different laboratories, faster progress, and increased focus on solving important problems rather than pursuing isolated, niche efforts. Here, 26 researchers from the field of visual metacognition reached consensus on four long-term and two medium-term common goals. We describe the process that we followed, the goals themselves, and our plans for accomplishing these goals. If this effort proves successful within the next few years, such consensus building around common goals could be adopted more widely in psychological science.