CRIS

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Head-to-head comparison of CAMPYAIR aerobic culture medium versus standard microaerophilic culture for Campylobacter isolation from clinical samples
    (2023)
    Arturo Levican
    ;
    Carmen Varela
    ;
    ; ;
    Isabel Briceño
    <jats:p><jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> spp. are considered the most frequent cause of acute gastroenteritis worldwide. However, outside high-income countries, its burden is poorly understood. Limited published data suggest that <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> prevalence in low- and middle-income countries is high, but their reservoirs and age distribution are different. Culturing <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> is expensive due to laboratory equipment and supplies needed to grow the bacterium (e.g., selective culture media, microaerophilic atmosphere, and a 42°C incubator). These requirements limit the diagnostic capacity of clinical laboratories in many resource-poor regions, leading to significant underdiagnosis and underreporting of isolation of the pathogen. CAMPYAIR, a newly developed selective differential medium, permits <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> isolation without the need for microaerophilic incubation. The medium is supplemented with antibiotics to allow <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> isolation in complex matrices such as human feces. The present study aims to evaluate the ability of the medium to recover <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> from routine clinical samples. A total of 191 human stool samples were used to compare the ability of CAMPYAIR (aerobic incubation) and a commercial <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> medium (CASA, microaerophilic incubation) to recover <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic>. All <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> isolates were then identified by MALDI-TOF MS. CAMPYAIR showed sensitivity and specificity values of 87.5% (95% CI 47.4%–99.7%) and 100% (95% CI 98%–100%), respectively. The positive predictive value of CAMPYAIR was 100% and its negative predictive value was 99.5% (95% CI 96.7%–99.9%); Kappa Cohen coefficient was 0.93 (95% CI 0.79–1.0). The high diagnostic performance and low technical requirements of the CAMPYAIR medium could permit <jats:italic>Campylobacter</jats:italic> culture in countries with limited resources.</jats:p>
    Scopus© Citations 3  1
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    An ulcer on the arm of an immunocompromised patient
    (2020)
    Hasbún Zegpi M.T
    ;
    Alfaro-Sepúlveda D.
    ;
    González Bombardiere S.
      1