CRIS
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://investigadores.udd.cl/handle/123456789/1
Browse
10 results
Search Results
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Practical Validation of the COuGH RefluX Score: A Multicenter Study in Patients From Hispano‐America(Wiley, 2025-05-06) ;Anna Calm ;Luis G. Alcala‐Gonzalez ;Alberto Ezquerra‐Duran ;Francisco Alejandro Félix TéllezFermin EstremeraLaryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms (LPS) are often attributed to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), yet objective testing confirms GERD in only a small subset of patients. The COuGH RefluX score, previously validated in North American and Taiwanese populations, offers a non‐invasive method to stratify GERD likelihood in patients with LPS. This study aimed to evaluate its performance in a real‐world Hispano‐American cohort.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in 459 adult patients from seven Neurogastroenterology units in Spain and Latin America, referred for LPS between 2018 and 2024. All patients underwent endoscopy, high‐resolution esophageal manometry, and 24‐h pH or Ph‐impedance monitoring. Two versions of the COuGH RefluX score—original (including endoscopy and manometry data) and practical (including only endoscopy data)—were calculated. GERD status was defined per Lyon 2.0 criteria.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Key Results</jats:title><jats:p>Proven GERD was identified in 164 patients (36%). The original COuGH RefluX score showed an AUC of 0.706, with 89% sensitivity and 89% specificity. The practical version showed an AUC of 0.684, maintaining the same sensitivity and specificity (both 89%). Compared to the original COuGH RefluX score, the practical version misclassified 54 patients due to undetected hiatal hernia on endoscopy alone; among these, 15 patients initially classified as indeterminate were downgraded to low likelihood—4 with proven GERD and 11 with unproven GERD. A subset of 197 (43%) patients reported at least three cough episodes during reflux monitoring. Among those with strong symptom association (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 18), 67% had a high COuGH RefluX score, suggestive of a high GERD likelihood.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The COuGH RefluX score effectively stratifies GERD probability in patients with LPS. It may also identify patients with significant symptom‐reflux associations, guiding targeted testing and therapy. This pragmatic tool could improve resource allocation by reducing unnecessary invasive testing in low‐risk patients.</jats:p></jats:sec>3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Validation and psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ): Results of a multicentric study(2020); ;Tiffany Taft ;Dustin A. Carlson; Hugo Monrroy1 1Scopus© Citations 5 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral on high‐resolution manometry in asymptomatic healthy volunteers: An international multicenter study(2020) ;Benjamin D. Rogers ;Arvind Rengarajan ;Luiz Abrahao ;Shobna BhatiaSerhat BorScopus© Citations 14 2 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Spanish version of the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety score shows strong psychometric properties: Results of a large prospective multicenter study in Spain and Latin America(2021); ;Tiffany Taft ;Dustin A. Carlson; Hugo Monrroy1Scopus© Citations 5 3 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Fair reliability of eckardt scores in achalasia and non‐achalasia patients: Psychometric properties of the eckardt spanish version in a multicentric study(2020); ;Hugo Monrroy ;Arnoldo Riquelme ;Oslando PadillaEduardo Fuentes‐LópezScopus© Citations 5 2 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Ineffective esophageal motility and bolus clearance. A study with combined high‐resolution manometry and impedance in asymptomatic controls and patients(2020) ;Frank Zerbib ;Ingrid Marin; ;Luiz AbrahaoAlbis Hani18 1Scopus© Citations 29 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, High-Resolution Manometry Thresholds and Motor Patterns Among Asymptomatic Individuals(2022) ;Arvind Rengarajan ;Benjamin D. Rogers ;Zhiqin Wong ;Salvatore ToloneDaniel Sifrim30 1Scopus© Citations 33 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Esophageal motility disorders on high‐resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0
<sup>©</sup>(2020) ;Rena Yadlapati ;Peter J. Kahrilas ;Mark R. Fox ;Albert J. BredenoordC. Prakash Gyawali1Scopus© Citations 828 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Breaks in peristaltic integrity predict abnormal esophageal bolus clearance better than contraction vigor or residual pressure at the esophagogastric junction(2021) ;Benjamin D. Rogers; ;Arvind Rengarajan ;Ingrid MarinLuiz Abrahao1Scopus© Citations 4 1 - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire shows better discriminative capacity for clinical and manometric findings than the Eckardt score: Results from a multicenter study(2021); ;Tiffany Taft ;Dustin A. Carlson; Hugo MonrroyScopus© Citations 3 1 9