Universidad del Desarrollo

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries
(2022)
Charles A. Dorison
;
Jennifer S. Lerner
;
Blake H. Heller
;
Alexander J. Rothman
;
Ichiro I. Kawachi
Scopus© Citations 38 1
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
The Psychological Science Accelerator’s COVID-19 rapid-response dataset
(2023)
Erin M. Buchanan
;
Savannah C. Lewis
;
Bastien Paris
;
Patrick S. Forscher
;
Jeffrey M. Pavlacic
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Psychological Science Accelerator coordinated three large-scale psychological studies to examine the effects of loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations on behavioral intentions and affective measures. The data collected (April to October 2020) included specific measures for each experimental study, a general questionnaire examining health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, geographical and cultural context characterization, and demographic information for each participant. Each participant started the study with the same general questions and then was randomized to complete either one longer experiment or two shorter experiments. Data were provided by 73,223 participants with varying completion rates. Participants completed the survey from 111 geopolitical regions in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset described here is provided in both raw and processed formats to facilitate re-use and further analyses. The dataset offers secondary analytic opportunities to explore coping, framing, and self-determination across a diverse, global sample obtained at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which can be merged with other time-sampled or geographic data.
1Scopus© Citations 1 2
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Author Correction: A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic
(2022)
Ke Wang
;
Amit Goldenberg
;
Charles A. Dorison
;
Jeremy K. Miller
;
Andero Uusberg
1 7
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic
(2022)
Nicole Legate
;
Thuy-vy Nguyen
;
Netta Weinstein
;
Arlen Moller
;
Lisa Legault
<jats:p> Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges. </jats:p>
1 1Scopus© Citations 42
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
A multi-country test of brief reappraisal interventions on emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic
(2021)
Ke Wang
;
Amit Goldenberg
;
Charles A. Dorison
;
Jeremy K. Miller
;
Andero Uusberg
Scopus© Citations 81 1 1
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
(2018)
Richard A. Klein
;
Michelangelo Vianello
;
Fred Hasselman
;
Byron G. Adams
;
Reginald B. Adams
<jats:p> We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance ( p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion ( p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely high-powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied. </jats:p>
Scopus© Citations 750 5

CRIS

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results